advertisement

Computers should not be a course

advertisement

Now that the Jacarandas are dressed in their royal purple vestments, completing students all over the country are scurrying to make last minute preparations as they stand on the eve of the defining period of their lives. One of those people writing their final examinations is one of my many cousins.

advertisement

Anyway having heard of my famed computing expertise she decided to contact me and ask for help. So we spent two days going through her notes and study material together and I did not like what I saw. It seems computers, as the course is colloquially known by most students, is so divorced from everyday realities.

Most concerning of all are the examples that are used to introduce concepts to students. For example as part of their internal end of term examinations to test their Microsoft Excel skills students were given a workbook called countrygames.xlsx that contained two worksheets: country and games.

advertisement

Students were then asked to showcase various spreadsheet manipulation skills using this outlandish data which was about Olympic athletes who participated in Discus and Shotput throwing. Never mind the fact that this exam was set at what is essentially a rural school where the only Olympics they know is a fellow form four student and sports like Discus and Shotput are alien words.

My suspicion is that the whole question was pulled, verbatim, from some other country’s examinations and reproduced without modification by some lazy educator somewhere. The unavoidable downside is that as students continue to be presented with these alien examples they will grow to hate computers and resent the teachers themselves.

This is one example of many pitfalls of courses like those offered by HEXCO, ZIMSEC and even the much famed ICDL. Instead of presenting students with actual concrete examples that they are familiar with and can relate to, students are often presented with outlandish examples from the nether world.

The inevitable result is that most students grapple with the manner of teaching itself, the data sets they are presented with, and tend to view these courses as being a necessary evil rather than helpful.

This is 2015 and computers can no longer be seen or described as a new workplace phenomena where people could boost their chances of promotion by tacking the magic words ICDL or the phrase “knows how to use computers.”

Computers have invaded every part of our lives: in addition to their being on our desks, they are in our cars, on our laps, in our fridges and other gadgets, in our palms, in our TVs and Home theatres, in traffic lights, in our watches and even in our clothes.

We need to rid ourselves of the old teaching model where computers are treated as some kind of course or subject. Right now the powers that be have hastily added a chapter on computers to most syllabus subjects where they feature mostly as an afterthought.

For the most part students are perfunctorily asked to give the advantages and disadvantages of using computers every other year instead of being taught how they can make use of computers as a learning and research tool in each of their subjects.

I think the Education Ministries, in between their threats, ultimatums and bizarre syllabus changes, should consider following the lead of Cambridge and redraft syllabi to weave computers into the studies of each Course and Subject instead the odd computer chapter that is dutifully found in most subjects. Textbooks should be extensively written to make sure that they include examples that most students can relate to.

Computers should not be a separate course or subject they should be thought of and taught as a tool.


Quick NetOne, Telecel, Africom, And Econet Airtime Recharge

If anything goes wrong, click here to enter your query.


WhatsApp Discussions

Click to join a Techzim WhatsApp group:
https://chat.whatsapp.com/DhJIODAb9nSCqaB6fl4syL

If you find the group full, please notify us on +263 715 071 199 and we'll update the link.


8 thoughts on “Computers should not be a course

  1. I disagree with mr author. We are a poor country. Resources (computers) are few. The majority of people in this country don’t have access to ‘computers’ (desktops/laptops). The only time they get access to the computer is during the Computer class.
    Yes, Ideally students should do their English/Shona essay in Word/Google docs and submit via email or printed copy. But ma1. Only the rich 10% can afford to do that.

    On the example yema Olympics, zvonetsa coz some kids have never seen a train, some have never seen a baboon saka kuti va balanse zvonetsa.

  2. Good article except the Olympics example. People go to school to learn. If you don’t want to learn, go kumombe, but don’t be surprised if you learn something there!

    1. As well, you are supposed to illustrate knowledge of the concepts in question. Whether the data is from the Olympics or CAF doesn’t have any bearing on your ability to SUM a column, or format a cell as money.

  3. I think computers should be taught as a course, so that people know how to use them PROPERLY. As prevalent as computers are becoming in our lives, most people still can’t use them properly. They can install and play games, surf the Internet, download movies, but beyond that nothing else. How many people to you know who do their personal budgets in Excel?

    A computer is a tool, just like a car. People should learn to use them properly!! The fact that most people have cars doesn’t make us all good drivers. I’ve seen many a tablet/computer with obvious malware, a zillion browser addons, 5 level thick browser toolbars, performance “boosters”, battery savers e.t.c… At times the owners of these devices are considered the tech savvy family member or friend, who have turned to you now the device is slow or crashing.

    You must not forget that these self (and mis-) educated users are the ones who will be on corporate networks in future breaking IT policy, and flouting safe usage guidelines, as they KNOW what they are doing.

  4. no excuses even in a poor country we need to actually teach students how things work not this bs of a teacher marking points in syllabus. and actually learning to apply computers in any context that is know enough to understand code but be an artist and create a platform to compose music/ a movie /play etc.

  5. There can be two approaches to this, passive education and direct courses. Both can complement each in achieving them same goal: a computer literate generation.

    Passive education can be used by introducing computers as a tool for education, just like pencil, ruler or books. In this case, a pc is used to finish an objective like completing a 200 words composition printed.

    Then also as direct courses where each subject is clearly stated to achieve a certain goal like writing a maths program. Some schools use programs like scratch to achieve this.

  6. Agree with Taurai B ,Some computer science courses may require advanced proficiency in computer language programming and mathematics, while others don’t assume any prior computer-related study. Some courses even provide resources for extra help, such as tutoring and forums. While many OCW courses supply sample course materials, including video, audio, Web content, slides, notes, music, demos and software like 99dollardesigners.com/,so that way makes very easy to learn computer skills to some students.

Comments are closed.