advertisement

Telecel & NetOne will not be merged, says ICT Minister. And our thoughts

advertisement
Supa Mandiwanzira

The government has no intention to merge Telecel, a mobile operator it just bought, with NetOne, which it already owns the ICT minister, Supa Mandiwanzira revealed yesterday to the Herald. Effectively, this means the government will have 4 operators; NetOne, Telecel, TelOne and Powertel all using using resources in a the same market to compete against each other for the same customer.

advertisement

The government has at least 50% shareholding in Africom (30% through IDBZ and 20% through NSSA) which also provides voice and internet services bringing the total number of government operators to 5 in a 14 million population market.

There’s no elaboration in the article from the minister on why this makes business sense for the government as a whole. He says though that the Chinese have done it this way and they’d like to copy the model:

advertisement

“We think the Chinese model, where the state owns China Mobile, China Unicorn, China Telecom is a good model so we will leave the two (Telecel and NetOne) as separate entities. They must operate independently. We do not want a situation where we will lump inefficiencies . . . like garbage in, garbage out.”

Conventional wisdom would suggest the opposite; that by consolidating its investments in these 5 companies, government is likely to get rid of the mentioned inefficiencies, in addition to ridding duplicate investment in infrastructure and administration costs. Combined, Telecel and NetOne, have just over 5 million subscribers and surely such a small size of company could be easily and more effectively run by one set of executives.

The argument that China does it that way is a bit strange here because of the many differences in the economies. China is a huge country with a huge population. The 1.4 billion people there would need expansive & sophisticated telecoms infrastructure to serve. The country has more than a billion mobile phone subscriptions making for extremely high value of telcos to be managed.

It also doesn’t makes sense from the point of view of what motivated China to create the trio. China introduced more government operators (China Unicom and China Mobile) in a market where China Telecom, a monopoly it owned, was failing to service the market adequately (in pretty much the same way TelOne was) and they needed competition to speed things up for a country their size. In Zimbabwe, the market structure at present couldn’t be more different;

  • There’s no Monopoly that’s failing to service the market;
  • The largest telecoms operator is actually not government – it is Econet – and government is competing already albeit without much success in business execution efficiency. What use would it do government to fragment their effort even more?

It’s strange therefore that government would just say “the Chinese do it that way and we will too!” seemingly without interrogating the reasons the Chinese had or even if this setup is working well for China. The fact is that the performance of said Chinese companies has been less than satisfactory and the speculation has been that government intends to merge two of them – China Unicom & Telecom. Here’s a excerpt from a Chinese publication on the matter:

The unexpected spending slowdown could be the latest sign that Beijing is planning an industry overhaul, following reports that first emerged last month of a possible consolidation of the three current mobile carriers into just two. Such a move would reflect Beijing’s disappointment at the failure of State-run carriers to become global innovators over the last decade, even after receiving monopoly rights over a market that has become the world’s largest for mobile and broadband services.

Such moves [letting private companies like JD.com and Alibaba play a bigger role in the sector] show Beijing finally realizes China will need to give a much bigger role to the private sector if it ever hopes to become a global leader in telecoms products and services. A merger of China Telecom and Unicom would be another important step in that direction by reducing reliance on the big State-run companies to provide innovative consumer services. Instead, these big companies could be relegated to the simpler and relatively straightforward business of simply owning and operating big telecoms networks.

In short, where China may be considering revising what they created about 20 years ago (creating 3 telecoms companies that compete with each other in a very huge market) because the current technology and consumer trends demand it, we’re copying the old strategy even despite vastly different market fundamentals.

That said there’s other speculation doing the rounds locally that Telecel was bought so it could be sold to Angolan multibillionaire Isabel dos Santos who, along with her father, President Eduardo dos Santos and other investors, owns Angola’s largest telecoms operator Unitel S.A. This, or a deal with another buyer, may actually be the reason government doesn’t want to merge its operations.


WhatsApp Discussions

Click to join a Techzim WhatsApp group:
https://chat.whatsapp.com/H94LKS22KuvEshYT12phqs

If you find the group full, please notify us on +263 715 071 199 and we'll update the link.


11 thoughts on “Telecel & NetOne will not be merged, says ICT Minister. And our thoughts

  1. So in other words its only Econet which is paying its dues to the gvt, the fact that Telecel now is “owned” by gvt means they will join the others who do not pay taxes and license fees.

    A lot of companies operate this way were they are owned by one entiny but operate under different names and management. Comair and Kulula are good examples or Dixons group plc.

    But all works not from directives, but sound business plans, not from how good board members ‘donate’ to the party but effectiveness.

    I still do not understand how NSSA is forced to pay for Telecel but do not own it. Now that banks were squized almost out of life through unsecured loans, is this the new way of getting money now?

    Where does this leave the infrastructure sharing noise?

  2. It is actually easier to merge Telecel and Netone here since they use the same network equipment thus Nokia Networks and Huawei. Instead the govt can decommission other towers and deploy them in other areas where coverage is either weak or lacking. The problem of infrastructure sharing is thus solved this way. By the way those empowerment consortium shareholders should be given 10 to 15 million dollars for their 40% stake given the fact that they did not contribute much capital

    1. How is it easier when you are failing to finance the ones you already own and make them competetive?
      Arm twisting NSSA to finance you to glory, do you think this can happen? Reality has proved again and again that you cannot force yourself to economic boom.

  3. I told someone that this ICt Minister is Corrupt, now is has his hands in the till at NetOne, TelOne and POTRAZ, now he is adding Telecel to his portfolio of looting.

    how can Gvt buy another telco when it has 2 that are strugling,
    Im moving to Econet, than have my SMS being looked at by these ZanuPF

  4. I’M STILL BEMUSED BY THE GOVERNMENT DECISION TO BUY TELECEL. OUR GOVERNMENT MAKE ME SICK!

  5. Come one guys… dont you get it? It all politics. The day our Minister entered into politics, he may have stopped being a real businessman. Business decisions and Political decision can – in Zim and other countries – can never mix, like oil and water. As you can see, his defences have been squashed already, implying that our dear minister is still probably learning how to respond to questions like an experienced politician.

  6. I get it. The government is like a person preferring to have 10 one dollar bills in their pocket than a single 10 dollar bill. Makes one feel like they have more cash., I don’t know why we expect logic from them

  7. 2016 will surely be interesting… And imagine as we go towards elections, 2017…2018…. icho! Telecel will be used in the campaigns.

  8. hahahahaha, the story of the year. All that noise about infrastructure sharing was actually about ownership. Sharing By Ownership, even tabloid magazines could not better this story, and they bought it for a song (40 million to be exact)……. It cost more to set up shop than buy an existing business or so it seems.
    The ministers new catch phrase SBO, and next in line Econet…… the saga continues

    Lets see 2 companies who have questionable operating license now owned by one entity that also regulates the industry directly and indirectly, we shall have to wait and see what happens in 2016… hahahahahha.. 2016

    Ndinewe Jmachache, i hate Econet so much i will now give them all my money. i.e until they are also bought by an arm of the .Gov

  9. ICT, Energy, Water, Industry, Agriculture, Mining etc. all decimated by people who are only interested in themselves? It is up to Zimbabweans to stand up to this nonsense? The Chinese Communists, who we want to copy and who we call our friends are very different from us. They have their people’s interests at heart.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: