Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Steve Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: peculiar issue generating truncated normals |

Date |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:27:27 -0500 |

I can't be sure, but shouldn't c[2,2] in the r2 = GHK equation be sqrt(c[2,2])? Steve sjsamuels@gmail.com On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Patrick Roland wrote: I've been trying two ways of generating truncated multivariate normals in mata, which give different results. I'd be interested if anyone could shed light on why this might be. In the code I generate bivariate normal draws with variance c*c', where c = (1,0\1,2) , truncated above at (-2,-2). In the first case, I use simple accept reject sampling. In the second, I sequentially draw truncated normals (this is explained here, for example: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mshum/gradio/ghk_desc.pdf). The means are consistently different, across many different seeds. The first variable has a mean of around -2.41 with accept reject and -2.37 with sequential sampling. I'm running Stata SE 11.2. This seems peculiar to me - any ideas? mata u = (-2,-2) trials = 100000 c = (1,0\1,2) GHK = J(trials,2,0) for(i=1;i<=trials;i++){ r1 = invnormal(runiform(1,1)*normal(u[1]/c[1,1])) r2 = invnormal(runiform(1,1)*normal((u[2]-c[2,1]*r1)/c[2,2])) GHK[i,.] = (c*(r1\r2))' } i=0 AR = J(trials,2,0) while(i<trials){ t = c*rnormal(2,1,0,1) if(t'<u){ i=i+1 AR[i,.] = t' } } mean(GHK) variance(GHK) mean(AR) variance(AR) end * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: peculiar issue generating truncated normals***From:*Patrick Roland <patrick.rolande@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Comparing AUC for weighted samples in Stata?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: peculiar issue generating truncated normals** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: peculiar issue generating truncated normals** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: peculiar issue generating truncated normals** - Index(es):