Netone’s Suspended CEO Is Wanted In South African For Fraud Charges: How True Is It?

Alvine Chaparadza Avatar
Zimbabwe telecoms

You know the saga Netone is currently involved in. The state-owned telecoms operator, Netone suspended its Chief executive officer, Lazarus Muchenje for undermining the authority of the board through his sudden dismissal (and reinstatement) of 9 Executives some weeks ago. Before his suspension, Mr. Muchenje had filed a court application suing the minister of ICT and Cyber Security, Super Mandiwanzira (and other 4 parties) for illegally involving himself in NetOne’s running.

To add fuel to the fire for Mr. Muchenje, today, The Herald newspaper published a story which is saying that Mr. Muchenje “ is reportedly facing criminal investigations in South Africa and the Democratic Republic of Congo over allegations of defrauding his previous employer InTarget Mobile Advertising of an undisclosed amount”. The Herald is basing this on an email it saw from InTarget Mobile Advertising chief executive officer M.r Norman Parking which said;

I became aware of the case between yourself and Lazarus Muchenje in the media. I wish to send this email to notify you of criminal investigations against Lazarus Muchenje in both South Africa and DRC, for defrauding the board and shareholders of his previous employer, Intarget Mobile Advertising. I wish to collaborate with yourselves to bring Mr Muchenje to task. Please make contact with me should you wish to explore this collaboration.

So is it true?

Before the report by The Herald today, we at Techzim received a screenshot of an email which was written the same text, verbatim, as the email The Herald’s quoted. The reason why we didn’t report about the ‘screenshoted’ email was that it didn’t seem to be legit because the domain name from which the email came from seemed wrongly spelled. Hence, we were doubtful about the authenticity of the email.  But it’s usual for company personnel to have email domain names which are different from their company’s actual name.

Regardless, it seemed like we would inadvertently engage our selves in smear campaign if we had published the email with so much doubt about its authenticity. And I think our doubts could be justified given that the Herald contacted Mr. Muchenje concerning the alleged criminal charges and the suspended CEO said he wasn’t aware of any charges from his former employer, InTarget Mobile Advertising.

I can’t comment but I don’t know of any investigations. I’ve never heard about them. I assume if they were true I’d know about them and I’d be in jail but I don’t know of anything

However, Netone’s board chairman, Peter Chingoka seem to believe the authenticity of the email as he said the issue was being looked at. The chairman said;

 It’s too early for me to comment. The matter is under sub-judice

Anyway, we have reached out to Mr. Norman Parking and InTarget Mobile Advertising concerning the issue to either confirm or deny the email and they are yet to get back to us. Furthermore, we are trying to contact Mr. Muchenje for more information.

2 comments

  1. Worried

    Well either way netone is wrong… If he’s not innocent then they failed on due diligence before they fired and if he’s innocent then they can sued… Either way the whole thing seems too convenient

  2. Techzim faux pas?

    Techzim, you quoted: “The reason why we didn’t report about the ‘screenshoted’ email was that it didn’t seem to be legit because the domain name from which the email came from seemed wrongly spelled. Hence, we were doubtful about the authenticity of the email.”
    For future reference, open you browser, type in integrat.co.za, press enter and see what comes up before commenting as above. In this case, you are redirected to Integrated.Mobi adding an element of doubt to your element of doubt.
    Whilst certain reports tend to be embellished, 20 seconds to at least test a Domain name can help.

2023 © Techzim All rights reserved. Hosted By Cloud Unboxed