advertisement

Econet CEO – Issuance of search warrants one of the tools used by state to interfere with rights

Econet management, Zimbabwean Telecoms

The court documentation filed by Econet as part of their Urgent Chamber Application to temporarily suspend the Magistrate Court’s decision to issue a Search and Seizure warranty to the ZRP makes for interesting reading.

Econet Wireless’ Chief Executive Officer, Douglas Mboweni has a written statement that is part of the Urgent Chamber application and in that statement the CEO argues that the state is using its powers to interfere with the rights of subscribers;

There can be no doubt that individuals and the society suffer at the hands of criminals. But there can also be no doubt that in the absence of a system of limits which limits state power by protecting substantive rights like the rights to privacy and the rights to dignity, individuals and society will suffer at the hands of the state and its officials.

advertisement

The issuance of warrants of search and seizure is one of the tools that has been used by the state and its officials to unlawfully interfere with the rights to privacy and rights to dignity.

The Econet CEO also described the facts relied upon by the 2nd respondent (Mkhululi Nyoni – Head of CID Asset Forfeiture Unit) as “ridiculous” and not enough to justify the Magistrate Court’s decision to issue a search warrant. Mboweni says this is the case because;

  1. Mboweni says contrary to Mkhululi Nyoni’s assertions Econet doesn’t have subsidiaries;
  2. Mboweni notes that Econet “doesn’t have a category of customers/subscribers known as merchants; billers and agents”. Mboweni says Nyoni noted these as Econet customers when in fact they are relevant to EcoCash operations. Mboweni says this shows that Nyoni copied allegations laid against Econet by government officials a few weeks ago;
  3. Econet’s CEO argues that all of their subscribers are “verifiable and auditable” and the company shares this information with the regulator POTRAZ;
  4. Lastly, Mboweni also said the Econet network doesn’t have the capacity to credit any money to its subscribers. He argues Econet can only credit airtime to subscribers and that this airtime can’t be converted into any sum of money.

The above points are made on the basis that Nyoni gave the following statement when requesting the Search and Seizure Warrant;

I have reasonable grounds to suspect that Econet Wireless (Pvt) Ltd is involved in Money laundering activities in violation of section 8(1) (a) (b) ARW section 8(6) of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act (Chapter 9:24). 3. On 9 July 2020, information was received to the effect that during the period extending from 011anuary 2020 to 30 June 2020, ECONET WIRELESS (Pvt) Ltd and as subsidiaries have been fraudulently creating and issuing non-attributable and non-auditable individual subscribers merchants billers and agent which they credited with huge sums of money and distributed to thee runners through their trust accounts. The runners would in turn buy foreign currency from the black before being externalized.

Mboweni goes as far as saying that Nyoni “did not apply his mind in coming to the suspicion that Econet is involved in the alleged crime.”

Lastly, the CEO also argues that the search and seizure warrant isn’t speficic enough in the following regards;

  1. It doesn’t specify the premises to be searched and yet Econet has “a number of premises from where it operates throughout the country.”;
  2. The search warranty doesn’t identify which police officer should execute it’;
  3. Mboweni argues that if the magistrate had applied his mind he wouldn’t have authorised the warrant “which does not point to the commission of the alleged crime in any way”.


Quick NetOne, Telecel, Africom, And Econet Airtime Recharge

If anything goes wrong, click here to enter your query.

7 thoughts on “Econet CEO – Issuance of search warrants one of the tools used by state to interfere with rights

    1. Customer privacy is very important, the gvt has no authority to invade such privacy and if econet doesn’t act it may lose its customers.

    2. Though I am not a fan of Econet, Econet is right in wanting the state to follow correct and legal proceedings and for the Search Warrant to be granted judiciously and not at the whims of the State by a frightened lower arm of the judiciary! Besides, a search warrant that does not specify the exact place to be searched is defective!

  1. Econet must not allow the state doing whatsover search. If I am not a criminal or suspect why should my privacy be invaded simply because there are one or two culprits who may have done something wrong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.