Zimbabwe and regional technology news and updates

Nyaradzo logo

Infrastructure Sharing: About threats, distrust and the opportunity to be grateful

I have had the opportunity to listen to the Minister speak on the infrastructure sharing issue a number of times now. I happened to be there when he gave the 90-day ultimatum speech last week and said:

We own NetOne, We own TelOne. We own Powertel. We own quite a significant fraction of Africom. And we believe that if we can get only our own companies to share infrastructure, we will create havoc to those who say infrastructure sharing is not necessary.

We all sat and listened as the opportunity to create common cause and build trust was wasted on threats  and bias. Effectively, the government was telling private capital that when it comes to rules and fairness in the sector, government is happy to use the companies it owns to compete unfairly against private capital.

The telecoms industry regulator, POTRAZ, reports to the minister – remember he fired a whole board (that deserved to be fired btw) just days ago.  Effectively, after the minister’s speech, POTRAZ’s “creating a level playing field” mantra was reduced to what we have known it to be for a while now – cheap talk. Now it’s clearer that when it’s said that NetOne and TelOne do not pay any of the regulatory fees that private companies have to pay, it is likely true. In fact it is so true that even a private player with the right government connections, got away with not paying regulatory fees for years!

potraz-fairnessWe sat and listened as the minister essentially told Econet that even though it had been smart to invest when the world had turned its back on Zimbabwe, even though it had created tens of thousands of jobs directly and indirectly via this infrastructure investment, though it had improved significantly how people communicate, radically created better access to financial services, contributed more than a billion USD in taxes and levies to government, created better  access to health… he didn’t care a bit and was going to have his way because he’s government.

A little thank you would have gone a long way. Reserving some words to appreciate the forward thinking that has benefited the country would have gone a long way. Maybe even a tax break to show sincerity in the appreciation would help.

See, I don’t think Econet is against sharing. In fact as many have already pointed out, telecoms companies share some infrastructure already. The problem is really on the terms of sharing, which, in all fairness, need to favour those that invested wisely, otherwise we are just sending the wrong message to private capital.

Recent developments are clear about how investment flows and which types of governments benefit. Said Kenyan President, Uhuru Kenyatta, on his Facebook page yesterday:

Investors in this initiative [a green energy initiative] have chosen Kenya because the Government is ready to listen to ideas and help implement them.

In the pictures accompanying the post is Strive Masiyiwa and other investors who were meeting him to discuss investment in Kenya.

It is clear how investment flows. It is not by threatening to cause havoc to private capital. It is by listening and implementing the advice.

All this would be easier to say if Econet itself did as much as try to live by the “Don’t be evil” principle. The company has lost a lot of credibility in the industry in as far as fairness goes. Its subscribers hate that it steals their airtime (I know, they stole mine), the competition hates that they compete unfairly, partners hate that they steal proposals and go it alone once they taste how profitable a VAS offering can be, and the media hate the company’s hatred for transparency and heavy-handed assault on the industry when the truth is outed.

It’s hard to sympathise with Econet when they are attacked, and yet, the smart thing to know is that an attack on Econet, nomatter how much you may dislike them, is an attack on all private capital and free enterprise. Even those that hate Econet need to come to its defence, and should know better to save everyday competition fights for another day. We should all know better, even better than him whom we defend, because in defending his cause, we defend ours.

The opportunity right now is as soon as possible to push for clarity on what sharing means. The government’s opportunity is to appreciate private capital for the contribution it has made and continues to make. This will help build trust so players can be assured their investment is not about to be appropriated.

Econet too has an opportunity.

Quick NetOne, Econet, And Telecel Airtime Recharge

7 thoughts on “Infrastructure Sharing: About threats, distrust and the opportunity to be grateful

  1. We are tired of your anti Econet articles Techzim are you on Telecel payrol? Kindly highlight where you are seeing sense in wat this so called Minister is saying. This is illegal grab on private investiment. Shame on Zim government!!!!

    1. strangely, someone that read the same article saw the exact opposite, here’as the comment they posted on our FB page:

      You guys are in Econet’s pocket me thinks… the way you always rush to their defence and never talk when they are stealing from us… I am so unliking you….

      Why is it impossible in Zimbabwe for people to not see things in either Black or White, Zanu or MDC, Patriot or Traitor, Econet or Telecel? Can’t people have opinions without belonging to camps?

      1. Knowing your previous emotional rants where you accused people of working for Econet after commenting against what you wrote, it can only be assumed you are Telecel. History aside, I actually think you are pro Econet on this one. It’s difficult to be neutral in Zim, either you with us or aginst us.

        1. actually don’t think it’s possible to be neutral. people can have thoughts that are not neutral, but that still don’t belong with either of two sides at a table. people and their opinions can be on their own side. We can have 101 sides

    2. Here is someone who didn’t read the article, or read but didn’t understand. The article is in no way pro or anti Econet but is talking about government interference in private business.

  2. Thank you for looking this through bird eye view, I find it more on the facts than ranting.

    l reviewed all the comments l made on this issue and l thought maybe l missed something.

    Looking these threats from another angle, l felt maybe the minister is being fed anger, he is being told where to look and how to look at things.

    I strongly feel some people, a click in his ministry, a individual or group of people who have been in the ministries, who knows the system in and out, those with donkey years in the same position are to blame.

    They know how to cheat the system, they know how to sweeten a new minister and run circles around him and put blanks on his eyes and control what he can see.

    On the issue of firing the board, l do not think there is much to celebrate on that. He appointed the board, he should have known better. l bet the board members were paid handsomely before they left so that they do not even care. Its like creating a problem then solve it.

  3. But isnt around 2011 thereabout Econet was drooling at the prospect of sharing infrastructure, Netone had the widest coverage then. Econet has invested in Zim not donated. Their ROI in Zim. is their sole motivator and not sympathy. I admit Econet has revolutionized Communications YES, But its imperative to point the harm and dent they have put on entrepreneurship in Zim through their unrelenting cannibalism.

Comments are closed.