advertisement

Zimbabwe remains in bottom ten of ICT Network Readiness Index

advertisement

Network Readiness Index - GITR 2010-2011The just released (World Economic Forum) Global Information Technology Report for 2010–2011 ranks Zimbabwe 132 out of 138 countries in the Network Readiness Index (NRI). This is Zimbabwe’s third time in a row at this position.

advertisement

The NRI framework gauges 3 components to come up with a country’s total NRI score: the environment component, which measures the infrastructure, market and ICT regulation in the country; the readiness component, which measures the business, government and individual readiness to use ICTs in their daily activities and the usage component which measure the actual usage of ICTs in a country.

The report covers 138 countries from both the developed and developing world that account for over 98 percent of world GDP.

advertisement

According to the report, usage of ICTs in Zimbabwe, especially that of government and individuals, has the lowest score of all indicators measured. Other NRI indicators that scored low for Zimbabwe include ‘Venture capital availability’, ‘Software piracy rate’, ‘International Internet Bandwidth’ and ‘Secure Internet Servers per million people’.

Another main contributor to the low score on Zimbabwe’s market environment is the number of days it takes to start a business which is set at 90. In comparison, it takes 33 days to start a business in Kenya, 22 in South Africa and just 11 days in Tunisia.

At the very top of the list is Sweden with a total NRI score of 5.6. This is the second time in a row. Singapore is second, followed by Finland, Switzerland, and the United States in that order.

Kenya, Africa’s de facto ICT hub, is 81 on the list. Zim neighbor, South Africa, is 61. Other African countries in the top 100 include Tunisia at 35, Mauritius 47, Egypt 74, Senegal 80, Namibia 82, Morocco 83, Botswana 91 and Ghana 99.

Zimbabwe is ahead of Angola, Swaziland, Burundi and Chad, which is at the bottom of the list.

Reading the report, you notice it needs to be read in an early 2010 context and not the current environment. Details on Zimbabwe in the report for example show that no data were available for more than half of the indicators determining individual network readiness. Data on Individual usage of ICTs are also not current; Zimbabwe surely has more than the indicated 24 subscriptions per every 100 people; or the 0.0% cellular subscriptions with data.

Still, it’s not clear how much updated the data on other countries are, and how much better off the rating would be with the current information added.

You can download the report here.

 


Quick NetOne, Telecel, Africom, And Econet Airtime Recharge

If anything goes wrong, click here to enter your query.


WhatsApp Discussions

Click to join a Techzim WhatsApp group:
https://chat.whatsapp.com/Hkrbxuw2IByJdA6N43HBQc

If you find the group full, please notify us on +263 715 071 199 and we'll update the link.


4 thoughts on “Zimbabwe remains in bottom ten of ICT Network Readiness Index

  1. I wld like to believe that the NRI framework is silent about some specific vendor equipement used to gauge. Can usage of sub-standard equipment vendors guarantee a better world rank? I think if we are to be fair we need to know what NRI framework considers as real infrastructure and government readness.

  2. why do we keep making excuses for ourselves where ICT consumption is concerned?There is a LOT that still needs to be done ,i.e govt regulation,national broadband plan,
    infrastructure dev.When all these things are in order, then we can now question the criteria used to rank the country.Remember, the fiber that is being deployed now is old tech, it will take more than just fiber to move people to widespread ICT usage.Services is the name of the game!

  3. Just out of Interest Kabweza, where is zimbabwe positioned as a conutry in terms of ICTs penetration, be it cellphone usage, landline phone usage or internet usage

  4. i think to rank Zimbabwe 3rd time in a row at the same position may not be that accurate. it would imply 1 of 2 things for it to be correct:EITHER zim has not made any significant progress ICT- wise in 3 consecutive years (which i beg to differ with) OR all the other countries have made such progress that zim has had to remain at the same position.

    i have my doubts about these stats

Comments are closed.