Techzim

Zimbabwe and regional technology news and updates

advertisement

PostMoney has (almost) everything needed to succeed in the domestic remittance market, will it though?

PostMoney

There is no shortage of domestic remittance options in Zimbabwe. By remittance we are of course talking about the transfer of USD within Zimbabwe. Every one wants in on this lucrative business.

Zimpost has been in this business for a while. About a decade ago they launched Zipcash, a local and international electronic money transfer service. The service still exists today. It has had its users but has not taken over the market.

Much has been written about why Zipcash’s growth stalled. Little to no marketing and cash shortages at post offices were the main reasons.

Zimpost decided to have another crack at it and they launched PostMoney late last year. This time around they decided to lean on mobile and they are doing that in an interesting way.

We’ll get to the interesting way but first off, does PostMoney check enough boxes to succeed?

An extensive agent network

All ZimPost outlets across the country double as PostMoney branches. There are over 240 outlets and they are distributed widely. So, while InnBucks has a comparable number of outlets, Zimpost has a better presence in rural areas. Even in my neighbourhood in Mabelreign, we have a ZimPost but no Simbisa outlet.

Back in the day, Zipcash could not compete with the massive agent networks that mobile money players had, especially EcoCash. Those agent networks are no more and Zimpost is one of the best in that regard now.

Low cost

PostMoney charges 7% just like most of the competition. With 4% of that being tax. Zipcash is even cheaper at just a total of 5% in charges, meaning they only charge 1%, with 4% being IMT Tax.

Cash availability

This is what tripped Zipcash up according to Zipcash MD. Like we always talk about, when it comes to USD, Zimbabweans use cash. When we receive money using these remittance services, we typically withdraw all of it at the earliest convenience.

So, a remittance service that does not have cash at its outlets is dead on arrival. I don’t know how PostMoney is doing on the cash availability thing. What I know is that it’s harder for them to solve for this problem than it is for a competitor like InnBucks which has cash flowing in at all their outlets.

Bill payments

PostMoney is still working on this. Currently you can’t pay your bills or even buy airtime.

The PostMoney party trick

When you register for PostMoney you get a little item called a SIM-Skin that sticks to your SIM card. The SIM-Skin acts like a parasite and uses your SIM card to communicate with PostMoney servers. It does not matter which network you use, the SIM-Skin will use that SIM card to send out information.

When the SIM-Skin is attached you get an app on your phone from which you can transact. In some cases you will be able to access this app via the SIM toolkit on your phone. Without the SIM-Skin and app you won’t be able to transact.

What this means is that you don’t have to fiddle with USSD menus when using PostMoney. If you are so inclined it is #99 but you don’t have to go that route. Neither do you need to have an active data bundle like you need to have if you want to use the competition’s apps.

This all sounds convenient for the user but it comes at a literal cost. The SIM-Skin costs US$1. This means effectively, it costs that much to register for PostMoney. The competition does not charge anything to register someone.

Then there is the issue of the SIM-Skin sliding out of contact with your SIM. If that happens you will have to first restore the connection to use PostMoney. Thing is you might not notice that the connection was compromised until you want to transact. That is the worst time to find out and this may be a nuisance.

If you swap out SIM cards regularly I can see this feature getting on your nerves pretty quickly.

Do you think PostMoney will thrive?

On paper, it looks like PostMoney should take over the market, or at least compete. I think the marketing effort is what will ultimately decide whether it thrives or becomes just another also-ran.

Being government-owned, Zimpost has to house the competition at their many locations. This is in the name of financial inclusion. You know that you can get your Access Forex funds at Zimpost across the country, right?

So PostMoney doesn’t get to have exclusive use of the good Zimpost branch network.

That’s not insignificant but I maintain that the major hurdle is the marketing one. ZimPost does not have the best of brand images. For the longest time they were associated with lack of ambition and innovation. It will take some effort to change that perception.

What do you think though? Have you used PostMoney? What was the experience like? What does Zimpost have to do for you to use the service over whatever solution you currently use?

Also read:

InnBucks is back as a bank, is it still as low cost as it was before?

EcoCash FCA now cheaper to use, no more cash in/cash out taxes

Poor Marketing Taking A Toll On Zipcash’s Growth-Zipcash MD


Quick NetOne, Econet, And Telecel Airtime Recharge

7 thoughts on “PostMoney has (almost) everything needed to succeed in the domestic remittance market, will it though?

  1. Parastatals are not motivated to make a profit. The big chefs will still get their benefits, regardless of a profit/loss, at the expense of the bottom employees. They will tell you they were hindered because of XYZ, yet those things should have been tackled at SWOT analysis. The biggest beneficiary here, is whoever got the rebranding contract.

  2. I learnt something new called Sim Skin.Other the other hand, government owned parastatals don’t accept USD only swipe and ecocash for payment, meaning they have no source of USD.

  3. I find the business of sending money and taking such hefty margins to be one of the things most wrong with the Zim economy. Imagine all the hard work that one does to earn a profit of say 20 to 30% or if it’s your salary then to just lose 5 to 10% of that on just sending the money to someone else 😳😳. Ndounonzi muchekadzafa chaiwo. The world over domestic payment/remittance services are absolutely free of charge.

    1. I agree, I think it is very predatory. But, we must also try to help ourselves. Some people will dead refuse to open a lite bank account. But, ironically, will queue at a bank to collect sent money.

  4. Too much friction in my opinion. The SIM-skin + $1 registration are major inconveniences and the cash thing you mentioned. Let’s see how they fare

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.