Category: Global News

  • Take A Picture Of A Spreadsheet & Have It Convert Into A Fully Editable Excel File!

    Take A Picture Of A Spreadsheet & Have It Convert Into A Fully Editable Excel File!

    Microsoft Excel has come out with what is arguably one of their coolest updates on the mobile app.

    By allowing users to take pictures of Spreadsheets which become fully editable Excel files, this vital update will allow companies & government’s which were logging this data manually to transition without someone have to put in hours copying this information.

    Microsoft explains the new feature as follows:

    Add data to Excel directly from a photo- Using the Excel app, you can take a picture of a printed data tableon your Android device and automatically convert the picture into a fully editable table in Excel. This new image recognition functionality eliminates the need for you to manually enter hardcopy data.

    Right now the feature is rolling out to Android devices but iOS will follow soon.

    If the feature works as advertised, this will be hugely important and years of data can be entered much faster and more conveniently. For firms looking to migrate their database from hardcopy to digital this new Excel feature available on smartphones should be enough incentive.

    Download Microsoft Excel on Android

  • Xiaomi To Focus More On The African Market

    Xiaomi To Focus More On The African Market

    Xiaomi is a pretty popular brand but they have been seriously struggling in their home country with a reputation of making cheaper phones that people don’t want to be seen carrying. Fortunately, this hasn’t been an issue in India; a market that is obsessed with specs and cheaper phones. Xiaomi’s growth in India has probably opened the eyes of executives to the immense growth potential that might be present in Africa.

    If the words uttered by Xiaomi’s Senior Vice President Xiang Wang at MWC 2019 are to be believed then Africa is Xiaomi’s next target:

    We see the African countries building, accelerating their migration from 3G to 4G. We only have 4G products, so I think it’s the right time for us to learn that market, to serve the customers first and learn more so we can have more products for Africa.

    Wise move?

    If Xiaomi can get the pricing of their devices right (which they have proven able to do e.g Pocophone) then I think they will be able to make an impact on the price-conscious African market. In my view, the average African isn’t too concerned about which device they are rocking and if they can get a really good smartphone in the $100-$200 and that device can go on WhatsApp, then they are good to go. With Xiaomi already partnering with Google and making Android One devices, they could also make lower end devices around $50-$100 with Android Go and test the African waters with those.

    Though the lack of a timeline suggests that this was something in consideration at Xiaomi and not actually a concrete plan, it could be a while before we see Xiaomi actively focus on the African market. With the first smartphone factory in Africa on the horizon that could still be a good thing as Xiaomi could study the lessons learnt by Mara and establish their own factories thus making the devices they make for Africa cheaper. Just a thought…

  • eGovernment App That Allows Men To Track Their Wives And Daughters In Saudi Arabia

    eGovernment App That Allows Men To Track Their Wives And Daughters In Saudi Arabia

    Absher is an e-Government portal for the Saudi Arabian citizens to apply for birth certificates, passports and to pay traffic fines among other things. The portal can be accessed through the Absher app which is available on both the Google Playstore and the Apple App Store.

    The other thing it does

    Men can configure Absher to set limits to where their wives and unmarried daughters can and cannot go. The unmarried daughters can be minors or adults, Absher doesn’t care.

    When the wife or daughter uses her passport at an airport or at a border crossing, the man gets an SMS message.

    Apple and Google under fire

    Politicians in America are putting pressure on Apple and Google to ‘stop promoting’ the app. United States Senator Ron Wyden wrote to Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai the respective CEO’s of Apple and Google asking them to remove the portal from their stores.

    Apple is selling itself as a privacy sensitive company

    This issue could be exactly the opposite of what Apple Inc needs right now as they keep pushing the narrative that they are all about privacy and security.

    Both companies have policies on what type of apps can and cannot be allowed on their platforms. Policing such is not always easy and Google particularly relies on it’s community of users to flag any inappropriate apps.

    This is not strange in Saudi Arabia

    So the app is not really introducing anything new to Saudi Arabians. The law there has always required women to have permission from men (husbands and fathers) to travel. This permission could be given on a physical form before. The app only makes the process smoother.

    The folks giving pressure on Apple and Google are not denying that this system already existed, they are just saying Google and Apple should not be accomplices to such. What do you think? Should Google and Apple take down an app that has useful government services because they have different moral views than those in Saudi Arabia?

  • Driverless Cars And Other Changes: What Led To The Recent Ford-Volkswagen Alliance?

    Driverless Cars And Other Changes: What Led To The Recent Ford-Volkswagen Alliance?

    On January 15th 2019, Dr Herbert Diess (CEO of Volkswagen AG) and Jim Hackett (CEO of Ford Motor Corp) declared via a Press Release that the two companies have officially signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that will work towards the joint development of commercial vans and medium-sized trucks that operate on innovative technologies, with mass production scheduled to begin around early 2022.

    The majority of the world looks at the alliance as a turning point in global mobility solutions and transportation, owing to the collision of financial juggernauts in order to beat rising RND costs.

    In a recent report, HEV automotive manufacturer ‘Tesla’ disclosed their financial reports for the year 2017, which showed around 1.37 Billion USD in expenditure for research and development (RND). This is against its 93 Million$ RND cost for the year 2010 (year of inception). A dramatic 1,000% spike, which was bound to keep other automotive players out of the HEV arena. Former CEO of Tesla and present Director on the Board, Elon Musk, said that around 22% of the total RND costs were incurred during the development of their Lithium-Ion (LiOn) batteries, which are used to power the entire vehicle.

    However, averting RND costs are proving to be the least of Ford’s worries!

    With the growth of futuristic technologies such as Machine Learning (ML), Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Neural Networks (DeepNLP), mobility solutions for private and public consumer markets began to alter. From a mere market cap of around 20 Million USD in 2010, the HEV-Autonomous sector is gearing up to hit the Trillion Dollar evaluation mark by 2020.

    Elon Musk with Narendra Modi (Prime Minister of India) | Image source: Google Images

    Furthermore, as some of the biggest players in the market (Nissan, Tesla and Mitsubishi) have tightened their grips over the HEV-Autonomous market noose, conventional transport solution providers have scrambled teams and resources to start their own RND into HEV-Autonomous technologies so as to grab their slice of the pie.

    Ford Motor Corp might have been the pioneers in assembly-line manufacturing for public consumer markets in automobiles, but their market share has dropped considerably over the last decade. Even though a recent spike in sales has delivered relief to the vehicular giant, resulting in a 14% market share within the United States, this places Ford at the 5th position on the podium, with companies like Tesla, Nissan and Daimler-Chrysler inching closer.

    In 2015, Mercedes-Benz launched their concept driverless luxury vehicle ‘F-105’ in Las Vegas, which boasted swivel seats that enabled the driver and front-seat passenger to sit face-to-face. And simultaneously, BMW revealed their ‘i3 EV’ that could self-park as well as scan a garage to look for empty parking spaces.

    So to enter the HEV-Autonomous market, under the guidance of Hackett as the Smart Mobility Subsidiary Head, Ford Motor Corp purchased Californian based ride-sharing company ‘Chariot’ in 2016. Ford then expanded its reach by spreading Chariot’s services into other states in the United States. However, this turned out to be the company’s biggest venture failure, with the platform displaying abysmal returns (with an average of 3 – 5 users per day)! These numbers forced Ford to finally shut the doors on its Mobility project in 2019.

    Image Source: Google Images

    And the competition doesn’t end with its predecessors. Analysts have forecasted that Big Data players and technology leaders such as Google and Apple have gotten a head-start on their plans to launch driverless cars to dishevel the public and private automobile consumer market. This wouldn’t be unbelievable considering that one of the fulcrum points in advanced AI and Machine Learning tools is Data, and the technology players have hoarded and stored voluminous quantities of consumer related data over the years.

    Marc Winterhoff, Senior Partner at Roland-Berger (a US-German Consultancy firm that works with the World’s leading automotive firms), had recently commented that the annual sales of autonomous and driverless cars is projected to increase by 750,000 units globally. He also stated that this surge will spell doom for major automobile legacies. He further went on to say that only firms like Honda, Chevrolet and Volkswagen are likely survive the fight for public market share, along with automobile companies providing premium services like BMW and Mercedes-Benz.

    Another tremor within the industry is the famed ‘Hyperloop’, which is set to revolutionise long-distance travel. Andres De León, COO of Hyperloop One, will be making an appearance at the World Mobility Show in Dubai, as he is set to divulge the latest developments building up to the first official test of the technology. He could also be instrumental in shedding light on the latest news from Hyperloop One’s CEO, Elon Musk, and his decision to build a 760 MpH Hyperloop corridor between New York and Washington D.C.

     

    By,
    Nikhil Menon.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Huawei To Open Two Data Centres In South Africa

    Huawei To Open Two Data Centres In South Africa

    Next month, Huawei will begin work on one of two data centres they are building in South Africa.

    Huawei has said it will support localized public cloud services based on domestic policies and requirements as part of its plan for a fully-connected Africa. Huawei’s acknowledged they will be partnering with local companies:

    The company is working with South African partners for the construction of the data centers in Johannesburg initially and later Cape Town.

    With cloud and AI, we aim to provide enterprises, small and large, with one-stop AI platform services, enriching fine-grained APIs, adapting rich algorithms in diverse industry sectors and heterogeneous computing infrastructure so that everyone can use various artificial intelligence algorithms to solve practical problems

    The plans to build data centres in Africa where announced back in 2018 but back then Huawei would not disclose when and where they would be building the databases. The second data centre will be in Cape Town and Huawei is yet to disclose when work will commence on the Cape Town data centre.

    Huawei will compete with Microsoft and Amazon who are also interested in having their own data centres in South Africa. Huawei’s move will actually place pressure on Microsoft who had initially promised that their data centres would be up and running by the end of 2018. They have pushed that back towards the end of 2019. Amazon said they will open their data centre in SA in the first half of 2020.

    Why Africa?

    The promise of these big companies coming to Africa is promising for African companies who will be able to access their cloud services (AWS & Microsoft Azure) are lower prices. Pick n Pay and Absa already announced that they will be utilising Amazon’s cloud service once it becomes available. Another advantage that customers stand to benefit from is the lower latency as African businesses utilising these data centres within Africa will have their data travelling much shorter distances than before.

  • Here Are The Top Skills That Will Be In-Demand This Year, According To LinkedIn

    Here Are The Top Skills That Will Be In-Demand This Year, According To LinkedIn

    We recently touched on the top programming skills/languages that will get you behind a desk in Zimbabwe in 2019. Whilst this last was great for people looking to add new skills to their existing skillset or picking a career path, we didn’t touch on those who are looking further than being employed locally. Maybe you’re tired of Zimbabwe or you feel you would fit in better outside what are the skills that are all the rage in 2019?

    The skills compiled by LinkedIn were split into two categories; soft skills and hard skills. The soft skills are more like personality traits whilst the hard skills are the more tangible skills (For lack of a better term).

    Soft skill

    Apparently, 57% of leaders today believe that soft skills are more important than hard skills, which means though you may think these skills are avoidable, it seems you might be better suited to have them on your side if you’re going to climb up the proverbial corporate ladder. So what are the 5 critical soft skills you need to have?

    • Creativity

    Whilst robots are going to come and take over the repetitive jobs, society still needs creative genius’ who will map out the way for these robots and for the rest of the people who are less creative.

    • Persuasion

    You’ve ever seen people who seem to have great concepts but they can’t convince you or investors that the idea is great. Well, those guys are not persuasive and that’s a big deal if you’re going to make the cut. I think apart from being a critical skill for 2019, I think this will be critical until people can gather and rely on data to the point that they no longer trust their gut feeling. Until then, the more persuasive guys/gals will keep winning, for better and for worse.

    • Collaboration

    Gone are the days, you would hold onto your idea like a madman instead of sharing it and watching it grow. I mean, if you can execute the whole thing by yourself that’s cool as well but most times, two heads are indeed better than one. This is why one needs to be a good team member, and at the bare minimum have some tolerable social skills.

    • Adaptability

    We go back to everyone’s favourite topic; robots!!! I mean we’ve heard it all, the robots are coming to take all the repetitive tasks from us and if we don’t adapt we are dying! I know it sounds dramatic, and that’s probably because it will be a dramatic shift from the way we’ve been doing things all along. This also ties back to that creativity we talked about. If you’re not integrating the more creative processes in your workflow the more at risk you are.

    • Time Management

    I mean what can I say about this one? Time finite and because it’s finite, this skill will ALWAYS be in-demand. Unless of course, someone comes up with a time machine, and then we can disregard time.

    Hard Skill

    These skills are more in-line with the skills you’re accustomed to acquiring. The ones we get from school and our degrees or online courses nowadays. But anyway there are plenty more of these than there are hard skills.

    1. Cloud computing
    2. Artificial Intelligence
    3. Analytical Reasoning
    4. People Management
    5. UX Design
    6. Mobile App development
    7. Video Production
    8. Sales Leadership
    9. Translation
    10. Audio Production
    11. Natural Language Processing
    12. Scientific Computing
    13. Game Developments
    14. Social Media Marketing
    15. Animation
    16. Business Analysis
    17. Journalism
    18. Digital Marketing
    19. Industrial Design
    20. Competitive Strategies
    21. Customer Service Systems
    22. Software Testing
    23. Data Science
    24. Computer Graphics
    25. Corporate Communications

    There are some entries that surprised me more than others, like Translation for example but I guess AI hasn’t evolved enough to make machines effective translators. I’m not sure how long that will remain part of the in-demand langauges but for now it’s there. Are there any skills you think they missed?

     

  • Google’s Gmail Mobile App Get’s A Refresh

    Google’s Gmail Mobile App Get’s A Refresh

    Google has been refreshing their applications and it’s a bit surprising that Gmail has taken them this long to get a fresh lick of paint. Especially once you consider the desktop version of Gmail got a redesign ages ago. So how does the new Gmail look? Well, it’s a lot whiter than it was before the update. In my excitement to update the app, I forgot to take screenshots before the update for a side-by-side comparison;

    Hopefully, the colourful nature of this update will mean more opened emails.

    One thing I was disappointed by was the fact that everything else seems to be where it was before the update. It looks more like a cosmetic update than a functional update. I’m still crossing my fingers for a dark mode because this colour scheme will certainly burn your eyes (not literally, of course) if you try reading your emails in a dark room or at night.

    The new Gmail update is not widely available on the Google Playstore but you can download it from APKMirror. It’s also not yet available on iOS (at the time of writing) so you’ll have to patiently wait for the update if you’re using an iPad/iPhone.

    Also read, Check Out The New Gmail For Desktop: Some New Features As Well

  • Apple Urging Investors To Shift Focus From iPhones As They Have 900 Million Users They Can Monetize

    Apple Urging Investors To Shift Focus From iPhones As They Have 900 Million Users They Can Monetize

    Apple announced their quarterly results and as expected they iPhone sales slowed down. This wasn’t as big as many thought it would be because Apple is telling investors not to focus overly on the iPhones. Why? Because iPhones are in the past and that’s not where Apple expect their growth to come from going forward.

    Apple prepared investors for a gloomy quarter when they announced that they were going to miss revenue expectations. They did miss the expectations by $4 billion but Apple also had their second best quarter ever in terms of revenue, so it’s not as gloomy as it looked earlier.

    Why were iPhone sales lower?

    Apple CEO Tim Cook credited a number of things for the slowing down of iPhone sales:

    • The on-going trade tussle between USA & China does not bode well for iPhone sales.
    • The currency fluctuations relative to a strong US Dollar also had an effect on sales.
    • iPhone owners aren’t upgrading as frequently as expected. AKA the smartphone market is saturated…
    • The battery replacement program also means consumers are holding on to their phones much longer.

    All these factors led to reduced iPhone sales and the knock-on effect of that was revenue falling 15% Year on Year.

    So what will they do moving forward?

    Apple is just going to adopt the more popular business models making the rounds right now: the as-a-service model. This will mean that subscription services such as Apple Music, Apple TV, the App Store will be where Apple expects to get most of their “peas” going forward. Apple has been putting a lot of investment in a Netflix competitor scheduled for 2019 and apparently, they are also working on a Netflix for games that will be part of the app store in future.

    To show how serious Apple is about monetizing users after they buy the phones, Apple informed investors the global user install base for iPhone for the first time; 900 million iPhones.

    Tim Cook did say an interesting thing to investors during the call:

    We don’t measure our success in 90-day increments. We manage Apple for the longterm

    This is an important statement that should deemphasize the media panic around quarterly trends when some seasoned investors say trends are more impactful over longer periods.

  • Gmail Down For Users All Over The World

    Gmail Down For Users All Over The World

    It seems the most popular emailing client, Google Mail is currently down for many users all over the world. It does seem the platform is working for some users whilst some users can’t access the site.

    Users trying to access the service are getting a 404 error:

    Not everyone is affected

    The outage doesn’t seem to be universal as I attempted to open my Gmail at the time of writing and I did so successfully. Gmail’s official Twitter account hasn’t acknowledged the downtime. Quite the contrary, they said there are no disruptions and urged a user to clear the browser cache and cookies. This seems to be working for some but for others, this won’t solve the problem. More confusingly, the official Gmail status page acknowledged the error and noted that they are working on a fix:

    We’re aware of a problem with Gmail affecting a significant subset of users. The affected users are unable to access Gmail.

    We will provide an update by 1/29/19, 12:50 PM detailing when we expect to resolve the problem. Please note that this resolution time is an estimate and may change.

    Take note that the 12:50 PM is UK time (GMT to be precise) which means 2:50 PM local time. Are you also facing challenges using the Gmail app or site?

  • FaceTime Eavesdropping Bug Dents Apple’s Reputation As The Protector Of User Privacy

    FaceTime Eavesdropping Bug Dents Apple’s Reputation As The Protector Of User Privacy

    FaceTime is one of the many pride and joys of iPhone users and along with applications such as iMessage, this has been touted as one of the many reasons why you should own an Apple device over Android. Unfortunately, a recently discovered bug makes using the voice and video calling platform a privacy nightmare…

    The weird bug allows iPhone users calling their contacts via FaceTime to hear the audio on the other end before the recipient has answered the call. This means if you leave your phone ringing and make some remark about why you don’t want to speak to that person there’s a good chance that the individual on the other end will hear what you really think of them. The bug can be replicated by making a call to a Mac as well which means it is not just the phones which are compromised but the computer hardware. It’s said to be affecting all users on iOS 12.1 and above.

    Here’s a video of the bug in action:

    Apple has said the issue will be resolved in an update being pushed later this week but for a company that seems to prioritise security over Google and it’s own Android software this does seem like a pretty significant blow. Until Apple fixes the bug, it’s not exactly clear how to protect yourself against this attack either. Oh, you can disable FaceTime altogether.

    To make matters worse, a Twitter user has discovered how to activate the eavesdropping bug on videos as well which means goodbye privacy for millions of subscribers:

    I just replicated the issue – on top of that, if you “join” the call using your invitation on another device (in this case another iPhone) you also get video!! Even though the call is still ringing / not answered on the destination device.

    Isn’t Apple all about security?

    Apple has always pitted itself against Facebook and Google by playing the security card. Their claims thus far have been that they don’t sell anyone’s data to advertisers and everything that happens on an iPhone stays on an iPhone. Now here’s a bug that’s contrary to all that talk and Apple’s competitors will not forget about this scandal any time soon. It’s something you can expect them to poke fun at in their marketing campaigns and with Samsung’s Galaxy S10 around the corner, I expect them to mention this incident in some funny ads. Samsung does love to poke fun at Apple in their marketing campaigns and this will probably lead to some funny ads.

    What’s with the increasing number of gates?

    If you speak to people who own iPhones their usually there for the “quality” of devices but of late there seems to have been an increase in the number of scandals that the Cupertino company are facing it does seem that quality control has been on the wane.

    Bendgate

    Last year there was the Bendgate that occurred with the latest batch of iPads. The devices were showing slight bends if they were put under slight physical pressure which could occur if you were keeping your iPad in a bag with some books. Now the fact that Apple said there was no problem with this was actually more infuriating than the problem itself but they probably did it to avoid returns and trade-ins which would result in Apple losing more money. So what did Apple do? They said the bending was normal and the iPads meet Apples standards;

    Relative to the issue you referenced regarding the new iPad Pro, its unibody design meets or exceeds all of Apple’s high quality standards of design and precision manufacturing. We’ve carefully engineered it and every part of the manufacturing process is precisely measured and controlled.

    Our current specification for iPad Pro flatness is up to 400 microns which is even tighter than previous generations. This 400 micron variance is less than half a millimeter (or the width of fewer than four sheets of paper at most) and this level of flatness won’t change during normal use over the lifetime of the product. Note, these slight variations do not affect the function of the device in any way.

    Again, thanks for reaching out and I hope the above explanation addresses your concerns.

    To make matters worse this was actually the second bendgate after the iPhone 6 Plus had a much worse scandal back in 2014. This was much worse because the phones were bending in consumers pockets, which means it was something pretty hard to avoid if your phone was defective.

    Antennagate

    Back in 2010 Apple also faced some serious criticisms when consumers buying iPhone 4s’ faced dropped calls due to antenna issues and the issue was serious to the point where consumer reports stopped recommending people to buy the iPhone 4s.

    Chipgate

    After bendgate, Apple had another issue in the iPhone 6s series that had to do with their chosen SOC suppliers. Some chips were made by Samsung and others were made by their usual supplier TSMC. The Samsung chips would overheat and subsequently battery life was poorer on these devices and thus another gate began.

    Is the quality control really up to standard?

    One thing that could explain why “Gates” are more common with Apple devices is simply the fact that they manufacture a gazzilion more devices than their competitor and quality control is affected at times. For example, iPhone sold 77 million iPhone 6s’ and this means that if 1% of devices were affected during manufacture this would affect 770 000 units which are more than enough to start a gate.

    Samsung went through one of its own scandals when Galaxy Notes started exploding randomly. Both Samsung and Apple have made it past their scandals and this FaceTime bug is another one of those blips on the radar that I don’t think will affect Apple in the long run. Manufacturing processes are quite intense and the fine margins involved in this process make it much harder for companies working on scales as large as Samsung and Apple to avoid defects. It does seem like these manufacturing defects are more common on Apple devices than they are with their competitors

    In the meantime, however, Android fans and manufacturers will have a field day and we will remind Apple why their devices are insecure and can be used to spy on them…

  • Apple Disables Group Calls As It Scrambles To Fix A Serious FaceTime Bug

    Apple Disables Group Calls As It Scrambles To Fix A Serious FaceTime Bug

    Android users around the around the world must be brimming with schadenfreude at the moment after a serious eavesdropping bug was discovered in Apple’s proprietary FaceTime app. The tech giant has since disabled group calls on the server side and has promised that a fix for the bug will be released later this week.

    What’s the bug

    FaceTime is Apple’s own video-telephony app that allows iPhone and Mac users to make audio and video calls with each other. Something along the lines of Skype, Hangouts and Duo. It is pretty popular in the US, Apple’s home country, although it has a lot of users around the world too.

    The app allows you to make group calls. You can, for example during an ongoing call, add another contact to the call by calling them and when they pick up they are added to call. It’s all pretty routine really and all the apps we mentioned above support it too.

    Because of the “bug”, some pretty paranoid people are saying it might be a deliberate backdoor although there is no evidence to support this, allowed someone(the caller) to listen in. All you had to do was call someone using FaceTime and if they did not pick up proceed as if you were to initiate a group call, instead of adding another number you would instead add your own number, the one you used to make the initial call. For some reason this tricked FaceTime into thinking this was an already ongoing call activating the mic, and some claim camera, on the remote end.

    This means you could listen to the other party even if they had not answered the call. That no doubt raises serious privacy concerns. Usually the reason why people do not pick up is because they will be otherwise engaged. Imagine if the other end is in a very confidential meeting and works for a competitor business. Lots of secrets can come out.

    Apple is on it

    This is pretty embarrassing for Apple who like to project the image of a company that produces polished software for high end customers. The truth though is that these things happen bugs are a reality of software. Recently for example the Debian package tool apt was revealed to have a serious flaw that could allow man in the middle attacks.

    The good thing is that Apple have owned the problem and acted quickly and swiftly shutdown the loophole. They have also said their engineers are working on the problem.

    We’re aware of this issue and we have identified a fix that will be released in a software update later this week.

  • Google’s Upcoming Changes To Chrome Will Disrupt How Ad Blockers Work

    Google’s Upcoming Changes To Chrome Will Disrupt How Ad Blockers Work

    Google wants to change the way extensions work in their browser and this change may affect your favourite Ad Blocking tools. Extensions seem to work pretty well, right??? Well, according to Google they could work better, especially when it comes to security and speed…

    Google believes extensions can work better and users will have control over what  extensions can and can’t do – somewhat similar to how permissions work with apps on your phones. They also want to improve the performance of the extensions. Apparently, extensions will no longer be able to load code from remote servers which means the extension that’s submitted to the Chrome Store will not be different to the code run by the extension after installing.

    One of the APIs that will get replaced with this update is called webRequest and therein lies the problem for ad blockers. This API allowed ad blockers to target ads as it could remove HTTP headers and remove/add cookies among other things.

    Google doesn’t like the API because it’s slow and they are replacing it with one called declarativeNetRequest. This should be faster than the old API and more secure since requests are no longer sent to extensions, extensions will not be able to see cookies or other sensitive bits of info. All this adds up to an API that can’t be used to block ads as effectively (or one offering less customization than the old API).

    For some ad blockers, the coast is clear

    For ad blockers like Ad Block plus, they will be reportedly safe or at least it shouldn’t be too difficult to adapt to the new API whilst other ad blockers will be affected. In the long run, we may have all ad blockers just shifting to comply with this ad blocker.

    For content publishers like ourselves here at Techzim, this might be a good thing as our advertisement revenue could increase if the number of ad blockers affected is high. Unfortunately for consumers, however, they may have to deal with intrusive sites because some sites aren’t exactly subtle when it comes to advertising…

  • Xiaomi’s Foldable Phone Looks Stunning But All Concepts Usually Do…

    Xiaomi’s Foldable Phone Looks Stunning But All Concepts Usually Do…

    So earlier this year, I posted a rant about the state of smartphones in 2018 and in that article I felt quite optimistic about what we will see from smartphones this year. Xiaomi might be proving me right with their recently released video doing the rounds. The video features Xiaomi’s President Lin Bin and he’s using a futuristic looking foldable phone and it seems like the most attractive execution of the foldable design we’ve seen so far. That’s if we are discounting movies and prototypes that will not hit the markets any time soon.

    We’ve seen phones with bezels made smaller in promotional videos and other slight edits so I’ll believe this is the final form of the device when we start seeing footage that’s taken outside of Xiaomi’s controlled environment.

    The phone transitions from being a sizeable tablet to a manageable but still big phone as both sides can be folded. This must be the “four wheel drive folding shaft technology” that The Verge reports Xiaomi as being said to have mastered.

    Will this make Android Tablet friendly

    It’s no surprise that the UI automatically resizes in this video as Android already confirmed foldable phone support for 2019. One would think that manufacturers are being given time to get a hands-on feel with this feature and that could be what’s in use in the video uploaded by Xiaomi’s president. It could also just be Xiaomi rendering on the basis of what they think it would work like.

    The only problem with my theory above is that Mi UI looks like it still suffers from the same problems that doomed most Android tablets. Maybe it’s in the software stakes where Samsung will pull away as their experience with Dex means they have experience with software for tablet and computer sized screens.

    Another interesting thing will be seeing how Xiaomi deals with the screen once you’ve folded the phones because in the demo video the parts of the screen looking away from the user were still lit up, which will probably destroy battery life. Anyway using an OLED screen will probably rectify that if this device goes to market.

    Pocket-friendly?

    One last concern I have with a device that big will be the thickness and the weight. It looks pretty thick but if the battery life justifies the size very few people will have problems with the form factor but I wonder what the weight will feel like for everyday carrying because consumers will now be expected to carry around a device with tablet weight in their pockets which might not be comfortable.

    What do you think? Are all these compromises worth what might turn out to be the one device that does everything? Will this be better than the already announced Flex Royole and Samsung’s incoming foldable which will reportedly be named Galaxy F?

  • Anonymous Claims To Have Taken Down Zimbabwean Government Sites In Protest Against Unrest In The Country

    Anonymous Claims To Have Taken Down Zimbabwean Government Sites In Protest Against Unrest In The Country

    Hacktivist group, Anonymous has come out and said they have taken down some government websites in response to the recent crisis in the country. The government went to the extent of shutting down the internet entirely in order to disrupt the protests and wreak havoc on citizens.

    A statement from Anonymous has been published by various media outlets and it reads:

    Greetings Zimbabwe, we are Anonymous. We have previously seen innocent people being killed in Zimbabwe. We have seen oppression and tyranny. We have seen people being oppressed for fighting for freedom. We cannot tolerate that. As we did with the Sudanese government, we have successfully taken down 72+ Zimbabwe government websites. This is only a start. Your banking system will also fall soon. Zimbabwe government, you have become an enemy of Anonymous! Your systems are in danger! In the face of oppression, rebellion becomes our duty. Courage to our brothers who fight for freedom in Zimbabwe and Sudan.

    ~~People shouldn’t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people. ~~ We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive tyrannical governments. We will not forget your actions. You should have expected us!

    Now, these government sites have always been shaky and some of the sites that were reported to have been taken down are working for some users whilst for others, they are not working. This is usually how these government sites are so it’s hard to know if they have been taken down for a fact because even on a normal day some of these government sites are inaccessible whilst others are working just fine. Now I’m not saying Anonymous CAN’T/DIDN’T hack these government sites but I’m not entirely sure if they have in this instance.

    Two compadres having totally different experiences with the allegedly “hacked” ZEC site last night

    If these claims by Anonymous are worth their salt then it will not take time to validate them as they have also threatened that the “banking system will also fall soon.”

    Some of the sites that are claimed to have been taken down but are actually functional include:

    Anyway owing to the fact that these sites are frequently down anyway, it’s hard to think that the government will be affected by this in any way as they don’t seem to care about the websites anyway.

  • Google Is On Course To Win The Right To Be Forgotten Case Against France

    Google Is On Course To Win The Right To Be Forgotten Case Against France

    The European Court of Justice has been told that it would not be feasible or wise to compel companies such as Google to implement the Right to be forgotten outside is borders. Although the advice was non binding the court has almost always followed the advice of its senior advisors.

    How we got here

    So a few years back the EU (or some part of it, the EU is a complex Supranational government) decided to give its people the right to be forgotten. On the surface of it the right sounds very innocuous: It says individuals have a right to be forgotten whereby they can request websites remove information about themselves from that site.

    Again a cursory examination says this makes sense. Let’s say for example you were stupid enough to make a sex tape and now its five years later and the thing is all over the internet. You would be within your rights to want that sex tape removed from all those sites. Generally there cannot be an arguments why you should not have it your way.

    The thing is there are a lot of cases where things are not so clear cut. A man is convicted of fraud for example and the information finds itself on a news site. Does this person have a right to have that information removed ten years later? English laws and the laws of many countries says after a person has served their debt to society their conviction should be spent. Americans and others are not so forgiving.

    Therein lies the problem. According to the French courts, not only does a person have a right to be forgotten in accordance with French laws, the world must follow French laws too and forget that person too. Back in 2015 they ordered Google to “forget” someone ( typically that involves censoring search results to remove this person).

    Google dutifully complied and removed this information in search results but only in results from Google.fr/ French IP addresses. The French courts were not happy so Google extended the censorship to the entire EU. Which means when this guy was googled from the EU his information would not appear.

    That still made the French courts unhappy?! They wanted the world to forget this guy. According to them Google should follow French law and censor their global results such that for example if someone were to google the guy from Zimbabwe their information would not appear. The French courts fined Google €100 000  because it did not remove information across national boundaries. Google appealed against the fine and apparently the EU needed four years to mull over this.

    Now that is (the French stance) absolute nonsense. Not only would it be illegal for Google to do so ( for example America has free speech enshrined under the constitution) it would open a can of worms that would mess up the whole internet. If other countries can decide to have things removed what would prevent say the Zimbabwean government from ordering Google to remove certain things too.

    Hellow! Is that Google? Yes we want you to remove all those Kupisa challenge videos from YouTube without failure. The ZRP is seized with this matter. Also remove that Wikipedia link to the Zimbabwean Coup. Who said it was a coup?

    Fortunately, after almost four years of fighting Google seems to be on track to win the case. The EU’s own adviser to the European Court of Justice, Advocate General Maciej Szpunar told them searches carried out in nations outside the EU should not be affected by the “right to be forgotten”.

    Like every sensible person out there he told the court that European data regulators should not be able to determine the search results that internet users around the world get to see. That should be common sense but in today’s world who knows how this turns out? Hopefully Google will win this.

  • The Notch Is Finally Dead! Are Manufacturers Making Smartphone Design Great Again In 2019?

    The Notch Is Finally Dead! Are Manufacturers Making Smartphone Design Great Again In 2019?

    2018 was a pretty uninspiring year in terms of smartphones. Now that features are pretty much equal in phones, OEMs (manufacturers) are competing in design but even in that regard, there’s not much they can do with the mobile phones form-factor that will greatly set them apart from their competitors.

    This is NOTch acceptable

    Crappy joke aside, basically every manufacturer started kitting out their devices with notches. Following Apple’s move to put a notch on their 2017 flagship –the iPhone X- the industry was always going to go down that route. LG, Huawei, OnePlus, Google, Xiaomi, Nokia and many other smaller brands adopted the notch for their 2018 designs. Except for Samsung of course. They stayed true to their own design but that’s a story for another day…

    Apple iPhone X, iPhone 10
    The device that popularised notches

    Getting weird in the East

    Maybe it’s not a bad thing that most manufacturers rip-off Apple because when they try to come up with their own devices it’s usually weird devices that don’t make much sense. Some perfect examples from last year include the Vivo Nex, Oppo Find X and the two-screened device that was the Nubia X. These devices are always cool-looking concepts but these and designs never translate to sales that compete with the likes of Samsung, Apple or Huawei. Basically, consumers go “Wow” at the unveilings and then go buy more sensible devices afterwards.

    Cool concept!

    Not all notches are trash

    We haven’t spoken about the tear drop notch. This was the more acceptable notch of 2018 (again this is subjective) and was also the least intrusive notch of the year.

     

    A much more elegant way to do the notch

    This style will probably remain relevant in 2019 and I have 0 problems with that.

    What will 2019 have for us

    Is it too late into the article for me to say I don’t care much about smartphone design or manufacturers making some mythical perfect phone? Personally, the Galaxy S8 was the peak of what a beautiful smartphone should look like and I’ll be surprised if the next iteration of designs will change my mind. What I did know however is the notch trend was weird because everyone acknowledged that notches were ugly but consumers were supposed to get used to them for some weird reason.

    So yes, even though design doesn’t matter much to me, I’m happy that the incoming trend looks to be waaaaaaay better than the devices that were being presented to users last year.  CES has been underway and one of the standout devices was the Honor View 20 and its punch-hole design. The View 20 has a much better design (to me at least) than most phones that were introduced last year and for people obsessed with all-screen phones this might be as close as we get since selfie-cameras aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.

    https://twitter.com/SnazzyQ/status/1082862422896009216

    The Galaxy S10 series is expected to have a similar design and it seems many other phones will be copying this trend in 2019 and I think it will be a welcome trend. Most tech reviewers are already heralding how much better this design is compared to what was there last year and I think even functionally the punch-hole camera design will give people their notifications bars back.

    Foldable phones

    If there is a design shift that might actually change the way smartphones work and look it might be the foldable phone. There’s been many a rumor about foldable phones and they date back to as far back as 4-5 years ago but it seems 2019 is the year we will finally see proper foldable phones. Heck we’ve already seen a foldable phone; the Royole Flexpai.

    It’s definitely not the most flattering device but I’m sure companies like Samsung & LG with more money and probably more experience with the technology will make much more desirable phones. We’ve seen a preview of a Samsung foldable phone and that means it may finally be around the corner.

    Oh, and for those saying ZTE Axon M was the first foldable phone, I beg to differ. It was literally foldable yes, but it’s not what consumers and most players were referring to when they referred to foldable phones. The tech to make devices like that has existed for quite a while now. The Axon M was essentially two phones separated by a hinge…

    One of 2018’s ugliest phone: ZTE Axon M

    Where does Apple go next?

    Well, Apple have to contend with the fact that they have Face ID before they make any new decisions on the design front. Face ID comes with a number of components all housed in the notch and transitioning to a punch-hole camera will mean you have 3-4 holes on your screen which basically rules out that design for Apple. They’ll probably continue with the notch but that matters not, people will continue buying Apple devices anyway… Or will they?

  • Apple Not Selling As Many iPhones As Expected So They’ll Lower Production By 10%

    Apple Not Selling As Many iPhones As Expected So They’ll Lower Production By 10%

    Back in September Apple released their new phones like they always do and they then followed up these releases with the new iPad. All these devices were met by stellar reviews on YouTube and in the mainstream media but consumers weren’t the biggest of fans and the sales paint a different picture.

    Originally Apple intended to sell 48 million units of their phones between January and March and then this was cut to 43 million. Now they’ve lowered their expectations further by 10% which leaves the figure around 39 million. That’s a bucket load of sales anyway but as reported by GSMArena it’s about a 20% reduction from Apple’s 52.2 million devices sold in the first quarter of 2018.

    There can only be so many “high-end” customers to sale to

    The startling drop in sales has been accompanied by an increase in the pricing of iPhones. “Apple’s a lifestyle brand,” they said. You are supposedly buying into an experience like none other. The only problem with these high-end lifestyle brands is they can only be sold to so many people so prospects for growth get smaller every time you get a new user into the ecosystem.

    A few years ago getting a user into the ecosystem was just the start as there was a higher likelihood of selling them something like an iPad or an Apple Watch to go along with their iPhone. There was also the likelihood that this customer would get the latest and greatest Apple iPhone upon release. The only problem now is that phones have kind of plateaued when it comes to features. It seems they’ve reached their peak and thus motivation to buy a new phone every year or even every other year seems to have died down. Same applies with the watches and iPads. You simply can’t buy those every year or every other year unless you are very privileged.

    What now?

    In the face of such dire consequences, it seems Apple is left with one choice. Either sale lower end, less expensive devices or watch the sales continue to tank. The only problem is no one wants to buy a less expensive iPhone because “IT’S LESS EXPENSIVE”. That’s the problem that lifestyle brands face. People buy them as status symbols and once there’s no status involved; selling that thing is trickier… We saw it with the iPhone 5C, which was a very good device (probably a better value proposition than XR) but no one really bought that. We’ve seen it with the XR. Though reviewers swore by it and thought it would sell, it seems that’s not the case.

    But what about the SE

    The Only time a cheaper iPhone made a dent on the market was when the iPhone SE came on the market. What does that mean? Maybe smaller/cheaper versions of the iPhone are actually a viable idea. Just as long as they don’t look like toys, which both the 5C and XR are glaringly guilty at. But even that might be a desperate lunge at things.

    “Who’s foot are we shooting? Ours or the consumers?”

    I believe this is the question Apple asked themselves when faced with their performance throttling scandal was unmasked last year. A user discovered that with new updates came worse performance and the fact that Apple wasn’t disclosing this turned into a heated debate. Was the company making performance as horrible as possible in order to make you buy a new iPhone? The fact that this wasn’t disclosed suggested so.

    Apple refuted the claims and said the performance cuts were implemented to save on battery life. It was a valid excuse but the secrecy surrounding it leaves the whole debate in a murky area. I’m not a big fan of Apple so I believe they did it to force people to buy new phones. What do you think?

    Anyway, now that Apple addressed this situation by offering $20 battery replacements, some believe this has led to a decline in sales as people no longer have to contend with crappy performance after every update.

    What’s next?

    Whether or not that is what’s affecting sales, what’s clear is that sales are being affected and Apple have to do something… What do you think is the answer?

  • Huawei Workers Tweeting From iPhone Get Demotion & Pay Cut

    Huawei Workers Tweeting From iPhone Get Demotion & Pay Cut

    New Year, same old endorsement tweets sent from the wrong phone. There have been many a time where celebrities tweet endorsing a mobile phone but the tweet is sent out with a different phone. What commonly happens is Celebs tweet endorsing phones other than the iPhone but then the tweet is sent out from an iPhone; which kinda defeats the whole purpose of an endorsement.

    This has been going on for a couple of years now but Huawei has outdone themselves this time as a tweet sent out from Huawei’s official Twitter account carried the embarrassing “via Twitter for iPhone” badge which is quite weird. To people who are well versed with how marketing works this won’t necessarily be a big deal because those people will most probably understand that Huawei’s social media accounts are managed by agencies and not directly by Huawei.

    Reuters explains how the mistake occurred:

    The mistake occurred when outsourced social media handler Sapient experienced “VPN problems” with a desktop computer so [it] used an iPhone with a roaming SIM card in order to send the message on time at midnight, Huawei said in the memo.

    Twitter, like several foreign services such as those from Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc, is blocked in China, where the Internet is heavily censored. To gain access, users need a virtual private network (VPN) connection.

    When it’s big name celebs making this mistake they are usually just told to take the tweet down but in this case, demoted and cut the pay of two employees held responsible for the careless mistake. Apparently, both staffers got a single-level demotion and a salary cut of about US$700 per month.

    Why is this a big deal?

    To ordinary consumers, it’s a bit baffling and it may even seem like an admission of the greatness of a rival when something like this happens. It comes across like Huawei can’t even be bothered to use their own products and though it’s just a blunder it sure does put Huawei in a bad light for people just looking.

    Huawei official Chen Lifang also acknowledged this:

    The incident caused damage to the Huawei brand

    And on the fans side it’s a + for Apple fans when the ever-raging debates of iPhone vs Android go on.

  • Cameroonian Separatists Launch A Cryptocurrency (Ambacoin) To Fund Independence Movement

    Cameroonian Separatists Launch A Cryptocurrency (Ambacoin) To Fund Independence Movement

    Since the cryptocurrency hype went to overdrive late last year, you may have thought you would have heard of every use for the cryptocurrency. Well, you’re not. AmbaCoin is going to be used to fund the freedom of a nation, the Republic of Ambazonia.

    Ambazonia, or Amba Land, is a region in southern Cameroon that declared its independence from Cameroon in 2017. The government does not recognize Amba Land, therefore, the separatists are trying to enforce their independence by force through fighting and replacing the use of Cameroon’s official currency for the AmbaCoin.

    Whats Ambacoin for?

    The rebels are actually serious with the Ambacoin as they even have a Whitepaper, something which makes up the legitness of a cryptocurrency. The WhitePaper says that AmbaCoin will not only help their freedom and the creation of their own country, but it will also help to provide much humanitarian assistance in the northwestern and southwestern Cameroon.

    The negative effects of cryptocurrencies

    The case of AmbaCoin shows both the geopolitical and the economic effects of cryptocurrencies. Or better yet the geopolitical and economic effects of technology. If you have been following cryptocurrencies you know that they are are also infamous for funding illegal activities.  The AmbaCoin is one major example of what cryptocurrencies can help fuel, which is a war in this case.

    Before today, we knew that a foreign government or institution (like the CIA) would fund causes like Ambazonia but now with technology, particularly cryptocurrencies even individuals who just want to profiteer can finance such causes too. In other words, cryptocurrencies now make it possible to crowdsource funds even if whats being funded is illegal. Which is partly why many countries like Zimbabwe are not warming to the idea of cryptocurrencies.

    A ‘Petro-coin copier’?

    AmbaCoin shares some similarities together with its Venezuelan cousin (Petro coin), along with the socio-economic upheaval that led to its creation. Like Petro, AmbaCoin claims to be asset-backed cryptocurrency, with the belongings in the query being “pure sources and future revenue from the treasury”.

    As with the case of Petro, AmbaCoin and its promoters connect explicit significance to the guarantees of funding and revolutionary rhetoric without essentially offering a transparent and rational framework that may assure the achievement of these guarantees.

  • France To Introduce A Digital Tax On New Year Targeting Companies Like Google, Facebook

    France To Introduce A Digital Tax On New Year Targeting Companies Like Google, Facebook

    France is going for the jugular against tech companies as it contemplates introducing a digital tax from the first of January, 2019. The digital tax, which is being introduced to ensure that a fair share of taxes is paid by all companies, will target foreign tech giants that earn global revenues exceeding $853 million. Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said:

    The tax will be introduced no matter what on January 1 and it will be for the whole of 2019, for an amount that we estimate at 500 million euros ($570 million)

    The tax, dubbed GAFA for Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon, is for high-profit internet tech giants who France says, generally, pay a lower effective tax rate than other corporations. France is not alone in this assault against GAAF companies, its joined by Germany which also has been pushing the European Union to agree on a standard levy that all countries can charge on these tech giants.

    Whilst the EU deliberates on what to charge the tech giants, France seem to be on its way to make a bold move of going at it alone at the moment and later on adopt the EU policy when they come to a decision.

    African countries wish they were like France

    African countries can only envy what France wants to do. Many (if not all countries in Africa) would want to tax companies like Google but they are failing to do that. That failure stems from the fact that these tech giants are offering Over-the-Top (OTT) services, hence they have no offices in every country. It is only the developed or (fast) developing countries, where tech giants have a physical presence, that can levy these companies. Accordingly, countries like Zimbabwe, Malawi, Venezuela and many more where Google-like companies don’t have physical presence fail to partake in the huge profits they make.

    That’s why Uganda went as far as to even charge a social media tax on its citizens to dissuade them from using the OTT services provided by these American companies.

    But what other African countries and many want from tech-giants doesn’t end at wanting a piece of the tech giant’s humongous monies; they even want the data these companies collect from us. I barely think these (undemocratic) African countries’ demand is motivated by wanting to use the data for good purposes (e.g stemming money laundering and terrorism etc.), perhaps they want to spy on citizens.

  • Contrary To Some Reports Tesla Is Probably Not Coming To South Africa Next Year

    Contrary To Some Reports Tesla Is Probably Not Coming To South Africa Next Year

    After tweeting about the opening of several more Tesla dealerships in the United States, Tesla’s founder and CEO Elon Musk was asked by Riccardo Spagni , a South African, cryptocurrency “expert”, when Tesla was coming to open an official dealership in South Africa. Elon Musk replied  that Tesla could probably make that happen as early as next year.

    There are two things to note here. Elon Musk, if you didn’t know, is actually a South African citizen by birth. The United States in typical fashion stole him in the same way they steal all talented Indians and Chinese  students and yet somehow find a way to talk about building a wall to keep out immigrants. The second thing to note is that Elon was probably being polite and optimistic here.

    A lot of publications took this to mean Tesla was actually going to open a dealership down in Mzansi. In fact some excited Zimbabweans are already talking about how this is going to be a boon to the Zimbabwean economy. Like we haven’t heard all such euphoric talk before! Remember how the 2010 World Cup was going to bring about an economic boom and that never happened. Then came the diamonds and recently oil in Mzarabani.

    The logic goes that once Tesla is in South Africa they will also open a battery plant too since these cars run on battery power. Ergo they would need Lithium which is “bountiful in certain parts of Zimbabwe”, so bountiful in fact people are using it as “vim” to wash their plates the legend goes. Conclusion we are all gonna be rich and all our troubles will end.

    The truth is while its possible that Tesla plants will be coming to SA in the future, it is highly unlikely it will be in 2019. Why? Well Tesla still has to fulfil demand in markets in the developed world before it bothers with the low income markets where Teslas are a mere bling bling. We have powercuts in the SADC for Christsake!  We already have a demand for power which outstrips our power generating capacity without Elon’s juice suckers ruining our lives with more power cuts.

    In anycase the response in the tweet feels very much non-committal in its tone. So  no Tesla is probably not going to build a plant in South Africa in 2019 and Zimbabweans are certainly not going to get rich selling Lithium. Our government and its elitist polices and laws will see to it that such delusions are nipped in the bud.

  • What’s The Secret Behind Chinese Phones And Their Irresistible Value For Money?

    What’s The Secret Behind Chinese Phones And Their Irresistible Value For Money?

    Over the past few years, we have had a lot of Chinese brands pull-up their socks and start making amazing phones at a budget. Ok, maybe amazing is a bit of an over-statement but surely for the money you’re spending on these devices (think OnePlus, Xiaomi, Honor, Vivo & Realme just to name a few) it’s a bit of a steal – especially once you start comparing these to phones from the more household names such as Sony, Samsung, and Apple.

    So what’s the secret sauce that makes Chinese phones much cheaper than their competition whilst still offering great and at times better value? Well, it’s a combination of factors and some of them are more obvious than others.

    Cheap Labour

    You don’t have to know a lot about China to know that their labourers don’t get the highest wages that side. This is the same reason why Adidas, Nike, Apple, and Intel all have large-scale operations in the country.

    The labour costs are on the rise, however, and soon this may begin to be reflected in the prices of smartphones from China but thankfully there are many other factors as to why the pricing is low so there is still hope.

    This is an obvious one but the cheaper it is to produce something the less expensive you can make it once it hits the shelves but the big question would then be, “even bigger companies are manufacturing in China so what gives?” Well, there are other factors apart from price…

    Transport

    Unlike Samsung and Apple who make millions of devices then ship them to different regions around the world, Chinese manufacturers are mostly targeting locals so they spend considerably less on transportation costs. These savings are then passed on to the customers. Some of the stuff is pretty simple but it all adds up on that final invoice…

    Lower Quality Hardware

    This is the one that Chinese manufacturers are most known for. Generally, the feeling is that if you buy a device (or anything really) then that thing is bound to last a few weeks or months then you’re onto the next things. Though this might be true in some cases when it comes to devices like Xiaomi, Oppo and OnePlus this is not necessarily the case. This isn’t to say the Chinese manufacturers aren’t skimping on hardware. They are just doing it in ways that are not necessarily what we expect. The general build quality of the phones coming from China has been good, bordering on excellent over the past few years. They are cutting the corners elsewhere…

    Processor

    So what areas exactly do they cut corners? For some, it’s the processor. You’ll notice that for a long time most Chinese phones came with MediaTek processors which are cheaper than the more popular Snapdragon processors. This has shifted slightly over the past few years as Snapdragon has diversified the processor line but MediaTek is still making a lot of the units you find in many of these budget options from the East.

    RAM

    Another corner manufacturers can cut is when it comes to RAM. Manufacturers can order lower quality RAM from RAM makers. RAM manufacturers sell their RAM in pieces and these pieces of RAM have to go through quality checks. So let’s say there’s a batch of RAM with 1000 pieces. The less number of failures per batch would determine the best quality RAM. A high-end manufacturer such as Samsung can demand RAM that has a failure rate of 15 out of a 1000 pieces and that would cost them more than Xiaomi who purchase RAM which has a failure rate of 36 out of 1000.

    This failure rate doesn’t point to RAM that is totally dysfunctional but RAM that doesn’t fit the factory standards or specifications. The factory won’t throw these lower quality pieces away, they just look for a smaller company to buy the lower quality RAM. So Apple, Samsung and Xiaomi could all have the same RAM in their devices but all of these could be of varying quality. This is not the case for every manufacturer but it is a route taken by some manufacturers.

    Marketing (Or lack thereof)

    Most Chinese brands don’t market their products as aggressively as the likes of Apple and Samsung. These two major brands are marketed worldwide and you’ll be hardpressed to see a country where they are not popular but this marketing comes at a cost. In 2016, Samsung spent around $10 billion and the relatively middling LG brand also spent around a $1 billion. These are not small figures and they are also reflected in the pricing of the devices once they hit the shelves.

    You’ll also see that Chinese brands like Oppo who spend a boatload of marketing on their flagships also price those flagships quite highly. Brands that don’t emphasise on this global strategy and focus more on creating hype and interest on social media and on a smaller scale have prices that reflect that.

    Embracing e-commerce

    Chinese manufacturers prefer to sell their phones online and that way that reduces their need to pay for storage along with the fact that they don’t have to build as many physical stores. Xiaomi has bucked this trend as they opened 500 Mi Stores in rural parts of India. This selling-online strategy translates into other aspects…

    Limited Inventory

    Because inventory is expensive and you need capital to keep inventory after manufacturing, Chinese manufacturers create devices in relatively small quantities and then sell them off using flash sales. Flash sales are great in two ways; they create demand for a product as users are clamouring to buy the product thinking it may run out of stock and they also allow manufacturers to continue rolling out their devices in limited quantities. It’s a win-win.

    Chinese OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) also use the Just-In-Time manufacturing method which allows them to save money. The JIT method allows manufacturers to make a device after an order has been placed. This way they don’t have to pay for storage in that case as the phone is being made and then delivered directly to a consumer.

    Copy-paste

    Patents are basically useless in China and because that’s the case not much capital is put into research and design. This is also why most popular Chinese phones tend to look like the Apple/Samsung device trending at the time. This is because the design has already been tried and tested and they just replicate that and push out their product into the market.

    Because patents are not really acknowledged in China, no OEM wants to be the group investing millions into a design only for them to be ripped off by their competitor with no consequence.

    Economies of scale

    One of the biggest factors why Chinese manufacturers can afford to sell their devices at a “competitive” cost is because they have a huge market of consumers waiting to buy. China has a population of 1.386 billion and this means that if a manufacturer sells their phone to 0.5% of the population they will sell that device to 6.9 million consumers – which is no joke. The fact that the market is this huge has a ripple effect in that many OEMs want to compete in that market which further promotes competitive pricing…

    That’s it!

    These are some of the reasons why Chinese brands are coming in the market with such competitive costs, so next time before you rush to dismiss Chinese brands and products for being ‘cheap’ it might be great to understand the situation leading up to these competitive prices.

    If I missed any contributor to the competitive prices don’t hesitate to get into the comments and fire away some of your opinion and knowledge on the matter.

  • Mthuli Ncube Claims UK Is Following In His Footsteps As They Propose Their Own Version Of 2% Tax

    Mthuli Ncube Claims UK Is Following In His Footsteps As They Propose Their Own Version Of 2% Tax

    The UK announced their planned budget for 2020 and surprise surprise it seems they are also looking at adding a new 2% tax as well. However, their version is less ruthless than ours.

    The digital services tax might be implemented in 2020 in order to target established tech giants. Previously Amazon and Facebook have been criticised for paying notoriously low taxes and it seems the UK is about to put an end to that. The 2% tax will apply to social media, marketplaces and search engines. Huge companies such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook will be taxed on 2% of their revenues instead of their profits.

    Last year Facebook paid only ÂŁ15.8 million in tax because they made profits of ÂŁ62 million in the UK. Revenues, however, stood at around ÂŁ1.27bn. You can see why the government would want to grow their tax base and get into this uncharted territory. If the tax is implemented, the UK expects to generate around $355 million in 2019-20, which is no laughing matter.

    The tax which at some point was opposed because there fears it would threaten startups will not target startups. Chancellor Hammond proposition is for the tax not to target loss-making companies and ensuring that companies with smaller profits will also pay the tax at a reduced rate.

    Will this even get passed?

    Though it seems, a great way to increase the government’s revenue the tax may not be passed at all. The United States government is not too chuffed about the tax as it will mostly affect firms that belong to their country. Because that’s the case there have been rumblings of a retaliation from the US government and a souring of the trade relationship between the UK and the US.

    The UK isn’t in a particularly strong position when it comes to trade partners –after the stunt that was Brexit- and due to that their bargaining power when it comes to these types of situations is not really great right now

    … In comes Mthuli Ncube

    Mthuli Ncube, the Finance Minister sent out a tweet acknowledging UK’s move:

    What can I say? The guy is an opportunist and he saw a chance to convince the public that “even the UK is doing it!” That’s not really the case here as the implementation is drastically different but it’s an easy win for the Minister who knows that most people won’t even read the story to actually understand what is really going on.

  • Qualcomm Is On A Mission To Make It Impossible To Sell Stolen Or Counterfeited Phones

    Qualcomm Is On A Mission To Make It Impossible To Sell Stolen Or Counterfeited Phones

    According to a study conducted by the EU Intellectual Property Office in 2017; 184 million counterfeit (fake) smartphones were sold globally in 2015. It’s estimated that these devices cost about 45.3B Euro ($53 billion) in losses to genuine manufacturers each year.

    Drumroll…

    This is where Qualcomm enters… The company which manufactures chipsets for industry giants such as Samsung, Apple, LG and countless other devices is stepping in and attempting to put an end to this mess. They have created a platform called Device Identification, Registration and Blocking System (DIRBS).

    Despite having a terribly long name and confusing acronym, DIRBS will supposedly be a software platform that “leverages each devices unique identifier to help mobile industry participants and governments alike combat reported stolen and counterfeit phones, which otherwise can bypass laws and certification requirements.”

    The platform will check in-country databases that are maintained by governments to confirm that devices haven’t been stolen, have been properly imported, have passed required certifications and have been allocated globally unique identifiers. The goal is to have regulators take action to mitigate the number of devices that do not meet the required standards from being registered with cellular networks.

    Privacy concerns

    On the consumers’ side, very few know how much risk they are exposing themselves to when using clone devices. Because clone devices can’t be accounted for, it’s easy for manufacturers to pre-install malware that seeks to steal personal information, make payments or manipulate messages.

    Safety concerns

    Manufacturers of clone devices use invalid or duplicated IMEIs (International Mobile Equipment Identities) which violates requirements that each device have its own GSMA-assigned unique and unchanged IMEI. Devices with duplicate IMEIs pose security concerns as their true origin cannot be traced, making them an attractive tool for the criminals who do not want to be tracked.

    Two birds…

    DIRBS aims to kill two birds with one stone as it not only makes it harder to sell clones but it also makes it harder to resell stolen devices. Stolen devices are often reprogrammed with invalid or duplicate IMEIs making it difficult, if not impossible, to block these devices.

    Wait… three birds

    For governments, there is an incentive to take a look at DIRBS as Qualcomm believes it could help them as well. Due to the fact that counterfeit devices rarely have required certifications, they cause a few problems;

    • Environmental concerns
    • Privacy concerns
    • Unfair competition (clones use established brand names whilst using inferior components and have appealing price tags)
    • Network quality issues
    • Tax evasion

    As indicated before, these devices are also a safe haven for criminals so the government should be concerned about that as well.

    Is DIRBS already deployed elsewhere? Yes, and it’s a huge deal…

    Qualcomm’s new platform was deployed in Pakistan back in May this year and using the system they’ve setup DIRBS seems very convenient. You just log in on the DIRBS government website and enter the IMEI of the device you are buying and it tells you if the phone you are using is original, and whether it was stolen. This is a huge deal! Think of it this way. When you are buying a new phone and you’ve gone to a dealer and he has offered a sweet deal that’s too good to be true? You just fire up a website check the IMEI and then you realise the deal on offer is too sweet because the phone is i) a clone or ii) stolen. All in a few clicks

    Will this work?

    Counterfeit devices are usually sold to people who are not tech savvy. Because that’s the case, these people rarely make considerations about privacy and authenticity. In fact, most of the times consumers buy these devices, they are under the impression they’ve bought the real thing. Qualcomm’s solution could work if implemented as they wish. If a phone is flagged early in its lifecycle as having a duplicate IMEI and it can’t be registered on any mobile network, that effectively makes that device a useless brick. Essential, Qualcomm is trying to nip the clone market in the bud.

    The outcome of this lies heavily in the hands of Network Operators, regulators and the governments themselves. If they don’t embrace DIRBS we may never even get a chance to see whether or not the solution on offer is effective.

     

    Qualcomm’s DIRBS platform has also been made open source which means governments, regulators and any interested parties can help destroy the counterfeit mobile market. Download software on Github.

  • Tech Billionaire Jack Ma Will Be Retiring From His Position As Alibaba Chairman In 2019

    Tech Billionaire Jack Ma Will Be Retiring From His Position As Alibaba Chairman In 2019

    Jack Ma has made it clear that he is tired of the office and he’ll be hanging up his gloves on the 10th of September in 2019. The former teacher, who went on to found Alibaba –the Chinese eCommerce giant- and make billions, has said the decision he is making will make him much happier:

    When I retired from the CEO position, I told the CEO team (in 2013) I should have more time playing golf on the beach. The thing is, I don’t want to die in my office. I want to die on the beach. But I find, oh my God, spent 870 hours in the air last year, and this year, 1,000 hours.

    Though Jack Ma is no longer responsible for running Alibaba’s daily operations, he is still the face of the company and travels constantly and meets Presidents of countries among other things.

    Where next for Alibaba?

    Though Jack Ma clearly has a busy schedule, a succession plan is in place. Relatively unknown (to us at least) Daniel Zhang, will be taking over from Jack Ma in a year’s time. After handing over the reigns to the incoming Chairman, Ma will remain on the Alibaba board of directors until the 2020 annual shareholders meetings.

    Ma also said he wants to return to education at some point though he did not mention in what capacity. Last year he famously said his “happiest moment in life was when I was making just 91 yuan (US$13.26) per month as a poor schoolteacher.”

    Also read, Chinese Tech Billionaire, Jack Ma In Zimbabwe. Maybe He doesn’t Care Much About Our Politics, Violence, Pending Results…