advertisement

Is the iPhone headed for emerging markets?

advertisement

Apple’s recent announcement that it will be selling iPhones via the prepaid carrier market raised a lot of eyebrows in the telecom industry. This is so because up to now Apple has primarily been selling the iPhone via mobile network operators (the carriers) who offer contract packages to their customers. Apple has also directly sold iPhones through its stores and select distributors. Now Apple has (finally) agreed to sell the iPhone in the unsubsidized prepaid market in a ground breaking deal with US carrier Leap Wireless under the Cricket brand. The deal requires Leap to buy $900 million worth of devices over three years.

advertisement

So why should I care?

The deal has major implications whether you are a Zimbabwean, Nigerian, Tanzanian or any other African network for that matter.

advertisement

So let’s have a quick look at what the Cricket deal looks like:

In the United States the iPhone 4 (completely unlocked) sells directly from Apple Stores for $550 and the iPhone 4S sells for $650. In the deal with Cricket the phone will go for $500 for the 16 GB iPhone 4S and $400 for the 8 GB iPhone 4. That price is significantly higher than the $200 the phone sells for under a contract package.*

When Apple sells the iPhone to network operators like AT&T it probably charges the same amount with a discount for the volumes that mobile operators typically buy.

The mobile operators in turn then subsidize the cost of the iPhone and sign users on a 2-year contract that is hedged with hefty early cancellation fees. This helps carriers get customers in the door by charging $200 for an iPhone. This ensures that the carriers recoup their costs and turn a profit over the course of the contract.

In this new arrangement Cricket is offering the iPhones at $399.99 for the 8GB iPhone 4, and $499.99 for the 16GB iPhone 4S. So why would consumers pay a higher price upfront? The sweetener offered by Cricket is the $55/month all you can eat data, text and voice package. This is a much lower monthly service plan than what contract providers typically offer.

Also, since this is not a contract package the customer is not locked to the service provider. To keep acquired iPhone customers, Cricket is counting on the super low $55/mo package to retain them for a long enough period to recoup it’s costs and to turn a profit.

You also have to remember that Cricket’s offer is discounted by $150 compared to the unlocked price in the Apple Store, so execution on this front is key.

So how does this translate to emerging markets?

With a market capitalisation of $527B Apple is now the world’s most valuable company most valuable significantly more than previous no. 1 oil major Exxonmobil ($363B) and I’d take a punt on Apple becoming the worlds first $1 trillion company by mkt cap.** So how does Goliath keep the growth momentum? The obvious source for serious revenue growth lies in emerging markets.

Since the iPhone’s debut, Apple has progressively been expanding it’s network and geographical footprint for the product. Initially the iPhone was exclusively offered on the AT&T (then Cingular) network in the US and has since expanded on both fronts. For a while Apple CEO Tim Cook has been hinting at a strong push by the company into the choppy waters of the emerging markets.

As Cook puts it “(since) 2007, we didn’t launch the iPhone outside the U.S. until 2008, Apple’s revenue combined from greater China and several other parts of Asia, India, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America was $1.4 billion. Revenue for that group of countries last year (2011) was $22 billion. We’re only on the surface.”

At the tech conference AllthingsD Conference Cook was asked “Why can’t you (Apple) build a $99 iPhone for emerging markets? You did it with the iPod and were proud of all of them.” and he replied “I won’t talk about what we’ll do in the future regarding the iPhone, but on the iPod, it wasn’t that we just needed a $49 iPod. We just thought that we could do the shuffle, and do it well. It didn’t start as the objective, but the result was that we could have different price points.”

At another forum the Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference (February 2012), Cook was less coy, nailing his colours to the mast “the smartphone market is projected to be a billion units in 2015, so just three years from now, and 25% of that is projected to come from China and Brazil. And so just two of the markets, 25%. And obviously, those are two very critical markets, but there are others as well.”

He then delivered the following killer app of a statement: “Everyone in every country wants the best product, as it turns out. They’re not looking for a cheap version of the best product, they’re looking for the best product. And so that’s the common thread that runs through.” (I’d suggest you follow the link and read the full transcript).

Is Apple about to cook the copy-cats?

That statement by Cook should ring alarm bells for G-Tide, G-Tel, Swav and countless other copy cat product purveyors that dominate the Zimbabwean mobile device market and other emerging markets. Locally G-Tel is offering a decent iPhone ‘clone’ for $80 which has popular features such as FM Radio, Camera, Video Recorder, Sound Recorder, Image Viewer, Video Player etc.

So the obvious question is: ‘Would a Cricket like plan of $400 & $500 per iPhone work in emerging market conditions such as those in emerging markets?’ On the face of it I’m inclined to say yes. But we are not entirely comparing apples with apples (excuse the pun) but more likely apples and oranges. Disposable income issues aside which local mobile operator would offer an all you can eat package for $55/mo (voice + data)? Yes that would be heaven, but seriously?!?

The more feasible option would probably be some type of package with caps and limitations. Another significant difference is the competitive landscape here, is very different. In the US (which has many more subscribers to boot) the major networks have to compete for customers with the MVNOs. This creates a much more fluid competitive environment encouraging innovation and excellence in customer service. Would the local operators adopt an iPhone deal if there was no competitive imperative to do so? Not sure.

To be sure generic phones targeted at the very low end of the market will not be threatened by Apple’s possible emerging market plans but certainly the upwardly and highly aspirational classes are certain to dump their me-too brands and make a lunge for Apple’s products (literally that’s what tends to happen when Apple enthusiasts queue for the company’s products).

The iPhone market in Zimbabwe is unlikely to be over 1 million (it’s a bit of a thumbsuck but I’m sure it’s about right if you are being generous), that figure will not move the needle for a company like Apple which sold 37.04 million iPhones in Q1 2012 (up from 17.07 million Q4 2011). From a size perspective though, this compares favourably with Cricket’s 7 million subscribers.

Certainly Africa with more than 600m mobile-phone users—more than America or Europe and with up to 97% of them on the prepaid platform surely Africa strongly figures in Apple’s growth strategy.

Admittedly, judging from Peter Oppenheimer’s (Apple’s CFO) comments, for now the company’s emphasis in emerging markets is China and Brazil which both have huge rapidly-becoming-wealthy populations.

To further put this in context, Bloomberg notes that China’s largest carrier China Mobile has 621 million subscribers. And by the way that China Mobile figure is six times as many subscribers as America’s second largest carrier AT&T with 100 million subscribers. AT&T was the first US carrier to offer the iPhone in an exclusive arrangement with Apple and today they are an important Apple customer, according to research firm BTIG (registration required) in 2011, AT&T represented 17% of iPhone sales for the year and 19% in Q4).

So clearly from a raw numbers perspective there is a lot of upside in Asia and Africa.

I don’t like cricket! I love it!

Analysts expect Cricket to sell a about 200,000 iPhones each quarter which by Apple standards is insignificant, but if Cricket meets that number Apple will certainly fall in love with it and the prepaid model. Apple is likely to offer the same deal to other mobile virtual network operator’s (MVNOs) such as Straight Talk which advertises a $45 unlimited voice minutes, messages and HSPA+ data package.

So if Cricket hits the iPhone full toss for six, expect to see iPhone deals landing at a mobile operator near you in the not too distant future.

 

*iPhone prices taken from this Businessweek article: Apple testing the waters for an unsubsidized iPhone push
**Valuations calculated using Wolfram Alpha and correct on day of publishing 05 June 2012


Quick NetOne, Telecel, Africom, Econet Airtime Recharge


WhatsApp Discussions

Click to join a Techzim WhatsApp group:
https://chat.whatsapp.com/KUBCXUZQEsQBGzP2d2EiCr

If you find the group full, please notify us on +263 715 071 199 and we'll update the link.


16 thoughts on “Is the iPhone headed for emerging markets?

  1. Apple could push volumes in emerging markets but the Zim one. Current disposable income levels and liquidity are two notable short-run challenges with no solution in sight yet. we’re also faced with the supply side crowded by middlemen and by the time the product gets into the hands of the final consumer the asking price would have doubled.

    Maybe, underline that, in the long run it will work.

  2. Without healthy competition as we know it in the mobile industry in Zim this will be a never-coming dream. Econet needs serious challenges so that e have a healthy competition. Look at the current econet deals…reap offs

  3. Apple is now taking emerging markets seriously because Android has literally harvested this market silly. Android is the de facto recognizable smartphone brand and phone of choice in these markets and apple is the fruit after dinner. With the recent spectacular collapse of Oracle’s patent and copyright infringement case against Google, Apple now has to seriously invent market-oriented ways to stall the Android Juggernaut than rely on litigation.
    For as long as I can remember Apple’s products have never appealed to the mid and low end of the market, precisely because of unattractive pricing. With the open-source nature of Android you get slaughtered for lunch and end up suing the darn thing in order to have a piece of the pie. I don’t see Apple making in-roads into emerging any time soon if not ever! Recent Android phones coming from HTC and Huawei for under $100 are both sexy and niffty. That’s what appeals to emerging markets. With Econet guaranteed a monopoly in Zim (not because their products and services are any better but because of regulation) we can dream-on about low prices as those offered in other competitive markets

  4. This writer is day dreaming, & lying at the same time. There is nothing like an i-phone clone @gtel & those local companies like swav & gtel are bringing in low cost gadgets ideal for the emerging market. Apple will never succeed in these emerging markets unless they make a low cost gadget & worse you can’t access the Apple store unless you have a credit card! Android rules, worse you should watchout for more low cost Android phones from gtel, swav, huaweii & zte

    1. Then Sadombo you are lying: 1) We live in Zim, we have even intereacted with these g somtns phones and officials and they are cloning/copying ifones-they admit that themselves. 2) even ifone is ideal for any market-technology is for evey1 – cost e separator THATS why this deal will make sense as it wiill reduce costs. 3) Apple will succed in any market if they try-so dnt rule them out without facts. 4) Issues of credit cards are just policy issues which can easily change and no sooner than later we will be transcating….MAYBE YOU ARE A SUPPLIER OF THOSE LOW COST GTELS

      1. Sadombo, indeed i am day dreaming of the time I lay my hands on an iPhone ndaneta kushainirwa!!

  5. Whilst it is noteworthy since its the launch of the first official prepaid iPhone. I wonder how LEAP’s success with the iPhone in the U.S translates to iPhone deals for Zimbabwe, let alone Africa. iPhone is not heading to Africa, majority of the African population cannot afford them.

    That statement by Cook should ring alarm bells for G-Tide, G-Tel, Swav and countless other copy cat product purveyors that dominate the Zimbabwean mobile device market and other emerging markets.

    i don’t think that they should fear a statement which has no bearing whatsoever on the local market. The comments by Mr Cook were talking about the western market, the $49 dollar iPod being referred to, never saw the light of day in Zimbabwe because it was still expensive for the local market.

    If they are to be scared they should be scared of the Asha series and not the iPhone, until IPhone makes a $80-150 smartphone they have no chance in Africa.
    http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/06/nokia-asha-touch-305-306-311/

  6. Initially apple designed its products with the elite in mind, however their niche is becoming smaller due to competition from Samsung, Sony erricsson et-al. In emerging markets there is absolutely no way that apple will make headway because of the existence of low cost mobile handsets especially nokia phones and android powered devices from Samsung, Huawei etc. the only way for Apple to tap into the emerging markets is by designing a low cost handset priced as low as $49 (Yes that’s the price I propose!), they may even consider making the iPhone 3GS this low cost device. It would aapeal to a lot of low income customers in both developed and developing countries at the same time boosting its revenue from apps and the iTunes music store.

    I also believe the issue of apps is not a problem considering that one can get gift cards for use to purchase apps, many local agents currently offer these including Zimazon and iclick.

    1. low cost for $49. Today NOkia X2/C2 have become asina irombe in Zimbabwe, the fones are not going for $49, they are going for 99 to 115us. Do not think for Zim buyers or underestimate our needs.

      1. Thanx for your response. My suggestion is not just centered on Zim but on the developing countries in general. $49 would probably not be a realistic price because shipment, tax and duty cost have not been incorporated. If these are taken into account something along the X2/C2 would suffice.

  7. I dont buy this article, the mid range phones will continue to be the real players in Zim, $150 and less, anything above that will be for those up the LSM and who might need the extras coming with the higher price. So Iphones and Galaxys still have a long way to go. The copy cats will continue to be the real choice for many – value for money…..or as long as they can do “facebook and google” kikikiki

  8. Thanks guys for your comments, very insightful as always. Indeed it’s still conjecture whether Apple would seriously push for selling iPhone’s in Zim/Africa/EmergingMkts, but i certainly think that their move into the prepaid space is a strong indication that they are experimenting with a new business model, a business model that is dominant in the less affluent parts of the world. To those who say it’s too expensive, may I remind of you of a chap by the name of Strive Masiyiwa who when he approached (then) PTC to partner with them on building a mobile network he was flatly told no one in Zim can afford mobile phones….we know how that story ended. Compared to folks in the US etc the average Zim/African has a lot CASH in his pocket. Folks in the USA earn more but also have a lot of credit and largely that’s how the most phones and ‘airtime’ are sold there

  9. I think the iPhone ‘experience’ is key to apple’s success. Without an
    enabling ecosystem, such as payment systems, access to top notch and
    relatively affordable data, i don’t see them going for it yet. It’s not
    just about the number of devices sold, it’s the ancillary services such
    as app stores, icloud etc that keep their pockets growing which
    therefore informs their decisions on which markets to get into. In that
    regard we may have to wait a while longer for the apple to ripen.

Comments are closed.